You're watching...
Did Casey Jurors Really Deliberate?
Details
-
Description
Former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman responds to juror's belief that prosecutors couldn't prove how Caylee died
- Duration 4:23
- Date Jul 6, 2011
You're watching...
Former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman responds to juror's belief that prosecutors couldn't prove how Caylee died
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advanceThis transcript is automatically generated
Prove beyond a reasonable -- a reasonable -- -- him how Caylee died whether the cause is murder or an accident.
Could the police investigation have been better joining us -- former LAPD homicide detective mark -- Market listing to that very thoughtful man -- -- into how he looked at the evidence.
It occurred to me that web at me he said -- -- -- -- they could determine cause of death.
Good child disappeared June 16 the remains were found in a December -- they're so.
In August there was a phone call to the police about whether remains a band and I thought you know if the crime scene had been discovered then.
Not compromised with although -- with all remains in better tact not subject to the elements.
That this might be a very different case -- they probably could.
Approved whether as a murder -- not do great.
And possibly the body had been at that location for up to fifteen days and advanced decomposition before it arrived at that location so -- say it would be pretty compromised by that point we -- -- remember that mr.
Clark saw something white.
Which turned out to be a scroll in December but he saw something white van.
So I kind of wonder but it you know what -- that argument you listen to this alternate juror.
Half of what I hear him saying he came from mr.
-- -- opening or closing I never saw anything and evidence anything and evidence about a horrific accident did I miss something.
When I -- you don't I don't know demand for.
Not happened because a defense does not -- Prove any thing.
What the defense hasn't newest poll calls and front and if and it and there are in the prosecution's own experts said that they could not deny it was an accident so it's not -- think you're shifting them the drug the burden.
Well is that they were poking holes.
And and so the prosecution necessarily then could meet its burden of proof.
I agree with poking the holes but this juror also set a couple things -- -- -- interview last night tiger I read the transcript and when it came down to mr.
Baez showing how the Anthony family.
Got rid of their patents.
He made it Clooney a conclusion in quotes I think this is how they got rid of K release.
Body.
End quote.
So he's not only speculating he fixed absent of any evidence except for how somebody very -- -- goes farther this man.
Believes that just won here with a decomposing.
Band on it forget the decomposing band.
Our hair of a child in the trunk is no big deal.
I don't wanna I wanna -- or a million hairs.
I disagree -- and a speculation I think there was speculation.
That add an assertion respect yes in the jury speculate.
On the father to -- in the -- on the -- -- necked Casey there was no evidence that what was different about the the pet.
Is that you can draw a reasonable inference rules Evans -- may need to draw reasonable inferences -- evidence to present at the does it present -- -- -- credit or not but it was presented so they -- reason -- person -- -- -- that Casey molested -- was simply a whole -- there was nothing to support that that was speculation asking for speculation that was different.
Bet that that's on speculation but he says today.
There was nothing introduce into evidence except for Jose -- opening statement about Casey having help getting rid of -- body so.
This juror if he is indicative of B twelve that actually decided this case they are intertwining.
Evidence and experts is simply come up and say this FBI expert doesn't know what he's talking about.
Although I don't have as much experience he doesn't know what he's talking about so they pick and choose.
Who they like or or what evidence cancels out the other that's ridiculous -- this is this juror this alternative also said.
He doesn't believe that anybody produced any evidence that he thinks that Caylee was ever and Casey Anthony's -- I mean are you so yes.
I they had to decide I'm very well how how there.
I gotta go mark but I acted as one note that I don't that I don't agree them very respective of jurors and and they do seem very different trials often the what we do because we see the the times when they're out of the room we hear the argument but it went well you know I like this another day.
All right.