Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
-- -- -- -- -- -- But a legal battle between a former California couple is just heating up at the center of the this do you listen to this four carat engagement ring worth nearly 53000.
Dollars a couple of them.
-- this thing.
So does the ex fiance -- to keep the jewelry or should she give it back let's ask -- Vicky Ziegler.
Now -- Weinstein both our family law attorneys this morning to debate a nice to see guys this morning welcome morning -- -- -- let me start with you should -- this guy.
Get this ring back.
I don't think He should get it back to California statute isn't like -- -- State of New York it's not an absolute.
This -- there's a little wiggle room for her to keep it she may be able to keep -- if she can -- there was good reason to break it off.
He's alleging in his complaint that she broke it off and he's trying to say that she He she get it back.
So this is really the industry He said she said can we ever really prove who broken off -- -- and and does that really even matter who broke at all it matters in California in both states it really doesn't matter and especially in Montana Montana -- say -- -- -- -- to get it doesn't matter who breaks off the engagement jurors forever so when dealing with the statute in California you really want to look at.
Who broke it off and you clearly can't get the ring return you can get the value.
Dollars whoever would be so crazy to pay for that -- or the actual ring back.
And at the the allegations in the complaint are that she allegedly had adulterous affairs she basically used him committed fraud took a 25000 dollar vehicle.
And -- and credit -- -- top paid off so it's really -- credibility issue at this point.
It it seems to noticeable -- stretch from his attorney but He He says quote he's suffering because He doesn't know He wants to move on with his life he's suffering because He doesn't know if she ever really loved him.
Or just the possessions He bought for her sounds like a bit of a stretch but at the end of the day after they broke up she ran -- credit card bills.
On his credit cards after they broke up.
That's what they're saying what you're from her yet -- mysterious we will we'll see what happens I mean it's not unusual well for.
A guy that's gonna get married to give his credit card -- -- do you -- so we don't really know what happened -- we were gonna get a little better idea.
But the reality is whatever the law says should she give it back may -- she shed.
I mean a thousand dollars on credit card bills afterwards regardless of whether or not it was.
That was in her cars to road -- up it was after they broke up out and a homer to a 2006 -- that He wants back.
Valued at approximately 25000 dollars the circumstances are always court's gonna look at the equity African -- ports deal and if -- -- to return the ring the Hummer.
And why should He pay for credit card bills when they were broken up.
That's the questions would judge is gonna look at all these factors and say listen what's fair at this point time there was a fifteen year different apparently she's thirty he's 45.
Maybe the -- takes that into consideration he's established has money perhaps she didn't so these are all factors that we're gonna have to look at the court will look at and make that determination I think we can all -- Morally and regarding -- it.
The -- should be -- -- -- ROC one of the US and Vicky and Janelle thanks so much for joining us this morning and debating is what is now.
Filter by section