Fox News
Expand
Browse All Video
Watch Live

You're watching...

Messy Divorce Ahead for White House Party Crashers?

Details

  • Description

    Prenup could prevent Michaele Salahi from settlement

  • Duration 4:59
  • Date

Clips

Also in this playlist...

Editor's Picks

Auto-advance: ON

Auto-advance
View All

Transcript

This transcript is automatically generated

-- -- back in session on the docket today -- high society for a fling and some front row seats.

Tarik and Mikhail also -- -- better known as the White House party pressures making headlines last week when He reported that his wife may have been kidnapped.

It turns out she nearly took off with the guitarist from the legendary eighty's icon journey.

Shocker -- and files for divorce but McCain could soon be seeing in a sad song if she is banking on an overstuffed divorce settlement why.

Turns out they're pre nup says she gets in Najaf if she commits adultery and she also loses all rights to spousal support.

If she moves out of their house so.

Could that actually be upheld in court -- let's ask our panel former prosecutor -- right Allah and criminal defense attorney Joey Jackson.

-- Well first we get a tweet last week from -- saying my wife has been kidnapped and very worried and we get the police saying.

Not to worry she's not been kidnapped she's with some -- -- journey as she says she doesn't want to be bothered you very happily install wherever she -- then we find out that Teri filed for divorce.

Then we seeded pre nup which says.

-- She loses -- right to any money or other property -- accumulated during their eight year manner -- if she committed adultery.

Which it appears she clearly -- -- a -- Yeah absolutely.

-- and not think she it's no she doesn't get half of the property can that they built up together.

As long -- way that contract which is basically what it is.

Was enforcement it was executed she wasn't under any kind of duress she wasn't -- there are any threats she had an opportunity to have our own attorney look at it.

Basically the general rule is -- it meant nationally is that things that cannot go in there has having to do with religion.

Things to do with if there were children how the children should be raised but -- -- -- how the together let's say they bought a house together while they were married -- she now lose any.

Right to have half of the proceeds from that house.

As long as she agreed to -- that is wrong she agreed to that when she signed on the dotted line when they got married.

The answer that question is yes.

We can that magnet -- I mean she should it adding I mean I -- adultery it's bad but.

She it's not it's like she signed away every single right every dollar she had -- Now wave Megan -- and ought that is not a heartless guy in the -- not -- be heartless side of the point of the matter is is that this is something that's cool unconscious and Billy the the point of the matter is is that she would she what He would end up being unjustly enriched.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Number one we're assuming she financially brains -- the table I don't know the answer that question whether was primarily as money.

Or hard money list -- it doesn't matter because what this thing it says is that she's gonna -- all rights of her money that's been like for your property make you heard that to their money their property and -- forfeits her right any spousal support -- are they getting any alimony payments she secret high because she moved out the right committed.

-- correct she is in control of that situation in other words if she chooses not to commit adultery if she chooses not to move out of the house.

Then she's got all the -- that she wants but she signed on the dotted line and again the key -- that a judge would look.

It did -- do so knowingly well aren't -- already.

Threats is there any chance -- that she can argue she did not commit adultery that she was just -- she loves journey.

Machine that He did not stop believe it and -- not love an eye catching -- squeeze it.

-- with that with John.

That was good -- -- there's always going to be the factual question as to whether or not adultery was actually committed so absolutely they'll examine that He could potentially say of course I wasn't committing adultery we would just maybe hugging and saying hello we tell them.

However the bottom line here is it's an equitable argument and what it's going to come down to was whether or not.

A judge is -- to recognize and respect but whether or not she was unjust He was unjustly.

-- -- a -- talk about the equity when you're talking about the -- the equity she basically gave up the equity when she signed on the dotted line.

He or she says let me say that.

I -- let -- get SP -- -- they are now saying that she is trying to turn her new life with his journey guitarist into a reality TV show.

And that these soon to be ex has -- -- correct.

Is aware of and willing to play along if the price is right why did you dislike these people anymore very quick answers -- in an hour.

-- absolutely amazing it's knows about what financial motivations of financial incentives -- could I.

They're if they're addictive thing addicted to fame is a perfect example a couple of addicted to fame while batting --

Load More