Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
-- Megyn Kelly with less than six days to a do or die deadline house speaker John Boehner saying it's time to rip off the band aid.
Claiming Democrats on the congressional super committee have yet to propose a plan saying quote you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
Meantime super committee co chair Patty Murray a Democrat from Washington State saying Republicans are stonewalling.
-- we have made it clear.
That we are willing to meet their proper credit have to be in a way that is fair to.
Working families and puts our country back to work that's the -- that we have on our hands.
I would hope that that as a way.
For them to understand that they need to compromise -- and come back to us and reach a deal which is critically important today.
But I think -- challenges that they have to resolve the differences in how on their side on revenue.
Alabama Republican senator Jeff Sessions.
Is the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee and he is my guess now senator welcome to you.
But now there is -- more and more of a push.
Both sides to reach some sort of a deals that they bet that the automatic cuts don't kick it 600 going to -- spending 600 billion to -- spending.
And we are seeing some Republicans even.
Start to talk more about revenue hikes meaning.
Tax hikes including.
The third ranking senate Republican leader senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee who argued that the Republicans.
On the super committee need to offer more revenues if this panel hopes to balance the books he wants the Democrats to do the same thing putting entitlements on the table but do you agree.
The senator Alexander that the Republicans need to add more revenues on the table.
No I don't agree with that and really uneasy about this whole process.
It's in secret.
They obviously haven't reached any kind of detailed.
Agreement about how the some sort of accord would be -- is supposed to be filed Monday.
And in and voted on by the him.
Winds today out next week.
This is a very Dicey situation.
The future of the American economy is at stake.
There -- the Democrats are resisting almost any significant.
Spending reductions except huge slam the Defense Department.
Which former Secretary Gates college -- protestors.
Catastrophe for America so I'm very uneasy about the process Reagan hoped something good will come out -- it.
But it's not the way congress should be operating in secret.
It ought to be open in public we ought to be casting votes defending our position and then the American people can be a participant in this process.
The Democrats claim that they put 350.
Billion dollars worth of Medicare cuts on the table and that that's actually a larger proposal that that.
Offered by the GOP.
In other words they -- they they would have us believe that they are offering more entitlement spending cuts then you are than the Republicans are is that true.
Why not -- you know -- and I don't know what they've offered.
What I've seen -- historically is when they make these claims when you actually examine it.
It results and I demand for a huge tax cut as it was as a way to handle this -- that problem.
Larger and larger tax cuts when Republicans offered a 300 billion dollar tax interest in the tax increases.
When Republicans offered at 300 billion dollar tax increase they walked away just a few days ago said that was not -- so I don't see.
I'm really uneasy about this process -- we're in a real situation.
In the unthinkable if they don't reach an agreement but if -- if the Democrats thank.
That they can put a gun at the Defense Department and force the Republicans to accept a bad deal they on this -- and I don't believe.
That congress of the United States will allow and could possibly allow what secretary defense Panetta says is -- holing out of the military.
And so I think that would be ultimately reversed.
So we've got to.
Come up with something that in the long term lays -- a fiscal plan for America.
The best one that's been done is the house budget.
They did their constitutional responsibility.
And pass the budget the senate Democrats have refused to do so.
And I remain.
-- unwilling to lay out a real plan that reduces spending and put this country on healthy plant right.
Now the stalemate continues I -- shift gears with you for a moment -- because you're the ranking member.
Of the Senate Judiciary Committee and as such have a thing or -- to say about Supreme Court justices and Supreme Court confirmation hearings and so on.
And there's been a dust up this week about Supreme Court justice Elena Kagan.
And whether she should be allowed to set when the health care law goes up to the Supreme Court in March they've accepted review of that case.
-- conservative groups sought information.
On her email correspondence -- obtained an email among others in which she wrote to a colleague.
Within the administration quote.
I hear they have the votes two exclamation points simply.
And now some conservative groups are suggesting that this.
Information she needed to share with you during her confirmation hearings and you asked her about her role in the health care -- are comments on it.
And others are suggesting it's a basis for her recusal but saying she should recuse herself from the case your thoughts on -- -- -- in the key thing in those emails was -- clear.
Evidence that she directed her chief deputy her personal deputy to take charge of the legal defense on the health care bill after it passed.
While she was solicitor general.
And not therefore she made decisions in the legal defense of this bill.
And you feel are your but you know in a law firm if they use imperial lawyer.
Directs them on subordinate to take the position in the case.
And began work on it they can't then -- appointed judge sit on that case.
So I thought and -- let me ask you about that senator because it that what what should she have done she was a solicitor general she she couldn't have taken it knowing that she was possibly going to be on the dragon.
-- -- I'm adding it to somebody else.
But then you can't sit on the case that's the question I'm not saying she did anything wrong in commencing.
The legal preparation to defend the health care -- That was perfectly on line for her.
But what she's done that she's involved herself in the litigation.
And is not normally in -- private lawyer would not be able to sit on the case don't you think.
Will be talking about that in a rally tonight but you know about Iraq isn't the com.
I yeah -- -- that she made decisions in the case not just that she delegate milieu an -- I don't think so if you're responsible for the litigation.
You're participating in the litigation.
Then I don't know real we'll -- -- it -- don't know what.
What O'Reilly tonight.
-- that you get a fake even a -- senator sessions thank you so much.
Thank you all that.
Filter by section