Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
As you noted mr.
speaker this story did that come from our network is you also know it is -- subject the conversation on the campaign I'm not I don't.
-- -- I take your John it was a you know your network news shows to start the debate with a don't try to blame somebody else you -- your staff chose to start his.
-- -- It now.
But I want to go to different direction -- -- by the pilings on CNN's John King he does not deserve it.
And his question did not want it the welcome everybody I'm Neil Cavuto and tied for some common sense here -- you usually usually I reserve the sort of thing.
For the end of this show but sorry folks I can get this off my test right now at the top of -- -- And it might over the top.
Take some of you walk again.
Enough enough with making a big deal out of the question that was there and an issue that was -- is -- I know this is gonna get -- and he was some of you but enough -- making CNN's John King a villain for asking it and Newt Gingrich a hero for effectively dodging.
Newt was perfectly within his rights trying to make king the issue for even discussing the comments of -- former spouse.
But I think -- would have been derelict in his duties as a moderator.
Had he not raised with just made comments of that former spouse look I respect speaker Gingrich for the energy and intelligence that he brings.
-- this race but frankly -- pile on the question -- because you don't like the question is getting a little -- in the debate who in this race.
John King is an excellent journalist.
Newt Gingrich is an excellent politician.
The excellent politician slots away an embarrassing question by trying to embarrass the guy who asks now that's to be expected the excellent journalists nevertheless.
-- ask that question knowing full well a crowd and a big one will turn on him because he did -- that it was to be expected that doesn't make John being bad for raising initiative it's become the elephant in the room.
-- -- -- -- -- -- Rising at a party whose symbol is the element would forget the irony of their response in that room.
Because of character counts when going after Democrats as it should it should count when going after Republicans even though some think it should not.
There it's there now argue all you got quite -- But the media is unfair to Republicans on this kind of issue but if memory serves me right although often late.
-- this stuff does happen for pure ratings Jews alone they sure as -- love this kind of it.
Gingrich is -- of swat it away and say he has made peace with god -- past transgressions.
-- save the piety for those who don't -- -- you're not holding back on a certain former democratic presidents transgressions.
Those -- run for office know what they're getting into Mitt Romney and as well.
Rick Santorum and his earmarks.
Newt Gingrich and his extremes.
Now I'm very sure that -- doesn't like the -- sitting on stuff they'd rather not bring up.
But that doesn't mean those who are paid to ask questions of -- -- should just lie down.
King knew what he was getting into raising these this -- with the speaker.
Let's be clear here.
These aren't John cain's personal issues.
These are the speaker's personal issues.
These -- John king's marriages these -- the speakers marriages again Newt Gingrich says he has made peace with god and all of this.
But that doesn't mean that voters of all stripes hearing -- clearly angry former spouse speak out are not entitled to at least some response from him on that's.
He responded good brand but he did so ripping the guy asking for that response.
My opinion here but I think -- on him I cannot stress enough how highly I regard both -- the speaker for his smarts and -- And John King for his impeccable fairness and decency.
We all know each other in this media business and I'm telling.
King is among the fairest handles evenhanded in this business I don't care what you say I follow this stuff closely I am telling you folks.
King does not deserve this pile on business I know this -- anger a lot of but if I were moderating this debate.
You can damn well -- -- have led with that question and -- that response.
I've experienced firsthand what it is like to get a Gingrich non response.
No -- -- but you didn't answer my question.
What would you do.
To my -- and move on this with the play within a year what's -- the congressional Republicans and they should attach it to the middle class tax cuts and that the president flew.
Now again I -- don't want him to let me stress mr.
Gingrich is phenomenal at these debates.
He's very good at the substance he's very good at the theater both are important crowds love it when you go after media -- to stats.
John King just asked Juan Williams just ask Chris Wallace -- -- against yet just asked me.
We are not responsible for the private lives and candidates -- to ignore we are responsible to our viewers to let them decide whether they should ignore.
Let the public decide whether it's silly it -- even in the face of very serious allegations with a former president.
It did not even in the face of unproven allegations with a former presidential candidate.
Again that the folks decide if it matters let John King do his job giving them that chance and let Juan Williams explained.
Filter by section