You're watching...

Is the President threatening the Supreme Court?

Details

  • Description

    Doug Burns and Kelly Saindon discuss Obamacare at the Supreme Court

  • Duration 3:43
  • Date

Clips

Also in this playlist...

Editor's Picks

Auto-advance: ON

Auto-advance

Transcript

This transcript is automatically generated

They just -- -- -- I'm guessing and maybe learn a little bit about what Doug was saying I -- -- for the live chat now Richard Barrett says simple mr.

Obama is trying to intimidate and threaten the Supreme Court.

Joy he he'd be says Obama doesn't have the right to question the highest court what are your thoughts on this Kelly.

-- tend to agree with.

Your viewers I think that he overstepped his -- I think it is so personal to him he can't separate.

I don't think he was saying that this is so clear it's unconstitutional.

It that it that it is constitutional excuse me I think he's saying DL go there.

Will.

-- why does he think that anybody would listen to him.

I didn't feel -- yeah -- what are US Supreme Court.

And you are arguably among some of the most powerful powerful people in the world why are you listening to him.

Well he pointed to some of them and he's thinking do you really want this fight -- I'm tired -- landscaper but he still manages the plants the final line.

All right so -- we take this now because I have a look at the live chat I'm looking at my.

My Twitter page and and people are just not.

You know -- in Escondido.

Says I'd like to wager that the Justice Department will respond to -- request for -- every page.

We -- -- will respond do not have to respond.

-- and how they've got -- right now how you know -- -- Yes they could not be the fifth circuit judge.

Said luck and you have the judge got a little carried away because facilities that you know put -- -- avoid it.

The big it has got to be intoxicating Kelly this is funny it has to be a minimum of three pages that was -- -- now though it and the point is this is what they're gonna right okay another crystal ball -- -- Here judges.

Okay we recognize as we must that -- well settled.

Since Marbury vs Madison.

That the Supreme Court has the authority to strike down congressional legislation which the Supreme Court feels conflicts with the constitution.

However what the president really man.

Was that since -- America the courts have been reluctant.

To strike down economically.

Grounded legislation and that sort of -- can -- Yeah -- -- I don't know.

Today.

-- upon the face telling the margins that we all data generated -- foreign aid will be bigger hit.

And I didn't have my little part that did not hear a lot of footnote it's the -- right OK I I think that I put out an.

Isn't that taste of opponents president of the united states of like to say we in the Secret Service helped select -- the constitution.

Is this a case of photos vs the law is this -- case of photos the vs everybody else -- To a certain extent.

I mean he really has his own agenda here he wanted to push it through he was able to push this -- through.

I personally don't think it's constitutional and now that the challenge is coming.

And -- people question whether or not as to who I was gonna sit on -- asked whether they were gonna rule right away.

Now because they took it they've had arguments they're going to rule.

I really think that was him saying hey I really back off let me do my job and they're saying that -- there's law as you got to file all of these.

-- 1954.

Asks pet feeble mind.

What do politicians.

Miss speak and the rest of us a lot.

Excellent excellent distinction -- right which goes down to intent I mean.

You know for for a Harvard Law School graduate and the president of the -- -- to say that it would be unprecedented for the Supreme Court -- -- -- -- piece of legislation is.

Bizarre.

To the point where.

You would have to think he missed all happy to say that -- --