You're watching...
Cavuto examines Rolling Stone's interview with Pres. Obama
Details
-
Description
Magazine throws too many softball questions at POTUS
- Duration 3:47
- Date Apr 25, 2012
You're watching...
Magazine throws too many softball questions at POTUS
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advanceThis transcript is automatically generated
So we reads all near times columnists not Wall Street Journal columnist although he does read -- newspapers.
Says the -- -- one of the smartest economic reporters out there.
Even -- -- is clearly one of the more biased over the top -- all things Republican economic reporters out there again.
It's -- says he doesn't watch cable although he does watch The Daily Show which last -- -- -- is on cable.
Calls Jon Stewart really the way.
He cuts through the nonsense but says nothing about young people depending on that one news as may -- -- being nonsense.
Says he spent a lot of time reading reports.
Studies and briefing books at home.
But it leaves enough time apparently for TV shows like homeland all -- all predictable.
All harmless.
All very much Barack Obama in an all too familiar not exactly earth shattering interview with publisher -- -- In Rolling Stone.
So it was not those answers that startled me as much as it was a questions.
Even considering the source not forget about thereabouts mister -- who's usually a pretty Smart dude.
But one with an obvious liberal -- didn't even try and what you consider this doozy combination diet of a -- it's a long way to bear with.
In working with the Republicans in this turned it seems clean.
That's a traditional rules of given that politics have cities that the Republicans have been playing a lose lose game which.
What's your relationship with the GOP leadership.
At this point but he gets better.
The quote is there any way to break through that obstructionism.
By Republicans.
And as if to cement the -- the grand old party's full a lot of grand -- -- This -- Doesn't all of that kind of talk and behavior during the primaries define the parties to another Republican Party and what they stand for.
No wonder then this question near the end of this incredibly -- exchanged.
It must help to get a break.
Given -- stressful and demanding the job it is.
Are you kidding me.
I don't Rolling Stone is in the Wall Street Journal and -- left -- Paul Krugman makes a far better read for a left leaning president named Obama then art Laffer who actually changed history.
Working for Republican president name Reagan and I know given rolling stones' music and arts loving audience that some of these questions might make sense.
But you would be throwing and I don't know at least some balance a follow up like try this why -- Republicans.
Obstructionists Mr.
President.
Simply because they don't like would your deal.
But you're not simply because you don't like what -- Why are days Satan and Euro sank four.
Why is it obstructionist.
Win.
They won't budget and taxes but not when you don't -- on -- And this goes directly to -- winner if you're going to extol the virtues of the Occupy Wall Street -- upon.
And ask out it is influence the president's -- wouldn't kill you mister winner.
To at least throw a bone to the keyboard and asked the same -- clearly.
Much much wider and but of course.
Occupiers hit Tea Party is not the president's rock star and even talks doing gigs with them.
Republicans aren't rock stars Jan winner and the president all but giggle at that please.
The next time.
Any -- tells you fox isn't there.
I want you to read this interview and ask yourself this.
Of the rulings.
And you want.
And then ask yourself this.
--