Levin: Whatever happens White House will try to evade ruling
Radio host on SCOTUS health care ruling, Holder contempt vote
- Duration 7:25
- Date Jun 27, 2012
Radio host on SCOTUS health care ruling, Holder contempt vote
Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Out -- constitutional scholar bestselling author mark loaded on how all of this is gonna play out mark on.
I know it's close game but added -- it's gonna go.
Well you know I'm not gonna.
-- -- -- except in this regard whatever happens in the High Court I predict that the executive branch under Obama and holder.
We'll do everything possible as well as the SD HS secretary totally paid whatever the Supreme Court does.
And look for various methods of executive Fiat to implement as much as -- laws -- they can.
Because I honestly believe that the executive branch right now that a control with so with the immigration case which -- seen it.
But fast and furious we've seen it with them or unconstitutional.
Appointments -- the president declared that senate resent that the government come before.
We -- attacks on state voter ID laws which which had been upheld by the Supreme Court before.
I mean I water on and -- to this president doesn't really like these other -- the government telling when he can't do things.
So whatever this Supreme Court does this president will not take -- likely.
On its -- a little bit about.
The latest sort of I don't know maybe black helicopter crowd theories on on on The Sopranos but EPA -- but -- -- get into that I didn't want to talk a little bit about.
Do you get a sense.
That some of the justices did admit to being typecast in other words.
Whether -- Justice Kennedy or or just spread and that they don't like that and they might rebelled from that.
And go out of one odds just to make a statement I I know they shouldn't be so driven.
But the data is one of the arguments -- them.
Passing this this health care as it stands and not getting in the way of that -- what do you make of that.
Well I think that the disease that only a Republican.
Appointed justices the the liberal justices of the activists on the court they're never worried about how others -- -- -- -- the characterization of who they are and what they do.
I don't think that's a legitimate fear I mean it's -- -- -- -- it -- the rumor -- -- it -- be does that.
Mark but that a lot of people say well you know that may be because go dating back to it as the bush school are you know Citizens United David might want -- recoil from that.
-- it while it might.
There's there's no doubt the liberal media sort of -- columnist and law professors have been doing everything they can.
The -- originally because this is on the court debacle.
But let us remember -- very political -- what people bring up the person who brought the first law that there was Al Gore was about bush.
Bush decided to try -- get the position decided.
In the -- heavy Democrats southern Florida counties.
And it just so happened that bush decided to fight back so the first case there was brought by court -- that.
They've been putting version is -- nothing of the sort what -- -- -- Obama and a supermajority Democrats in the house and senate which don't exist anymore -- the people who blew them out split split time.
I decided that they were gonna grab as much power as they cut the problem is they didn't confer with the constitution -- they took a look at it didn't give a damn what -- Like you cannot impose on individuals in this country American citizens.
A requirement that they participating.
Commerce that they can -- is not -- because of attacks they are seeking to penalize and that's.
Who do not buy private insurance and penalize insurance companies that do not write policies of the way the government dictates.
They've had never been done in American history before.
-- when you hear all these -- lawyers come on your you know and other places.
The courts now already stricken that editing like this congress has never -- anything.
Tarred by the it loser lawyers might appear on other shows -- But you might just about I don't know whatever it -- -- and other notes there.
I want you know I was so do a lot of CEOs.
Be -- winners or losers and -- and they've been lately telling me.
-- unless this whole -- to instruct him.
Just sticking a stake through the accident that the mandatory.
Coverage thing isn't isn't gonna kill the beast here that that -- you've got a strike on the entire law.
Do you agree with that -- -- -- quite right now two things.
The first -- the individual mandate is the greatest threat against the the relationship between the individual in this country and the government we -- Since segregation.
And I want to be very clear about that because we can have a government telling us what to do and pushing us around this place so it is crucial.
That that provision of the -- be stricken now as for the rest.
You see what they were already trying to do put -- on the Catholic Church and the the other aspects of their -- And I predict if the rest of this statute or most of it survives much of which we still don't know -- -- -- because they you know they have issue regulations.
They're going to be aggressive legal challenges so we're not gonna wait around for congress or the next election aggressive legal challenges attacking it.
And I'm gonna be one of them a Landmark Legal Foundation intends to do it.
Mark you know I had the pleasure listening you verifying radius so quite often and what are the things -- Discovered over the the months as this presidential races incident is some.
You like Mitt Romney you don't flip over and -- -- I guess he's a moderate here like movies he's not exactly your -- the tape.
But I think -- -- also said that you would prefer a can of our justice to two.
It's who the president having said that I do you think you do old.
A Mitt Romney harm because you reach millions of people Europe Hoover bestselling author.
And so your words and and you whatever you say carries considerable clout in that you.
Are are hurting at -- -- you.
Or -- while I was very successful stopping -- market.
Now I -- that that's not that's sad I wanna make it -- cleared but can I have on my program I will provide constructive criticism I don't checked my conservatism at the door.
It took my Republican baseball cap on and then run outplacement and and and and and that's just did -- -- -- don't -- -- -- you -- not constructive in the early days of it's finance it by now but now we're now and I wanna make it -- I can.
Mitt Romney -- blue packets -- -- -- agnostic women in order for Obama pollutants under the deal with everything I can at least.
That -- Romney wins in it because -- -- when he does plan with I and others would do everything we can't make sure that we have a conservative administration because that's crucial to do.
But that's is that.
Everything I can do it my power whether it's legally -- landmark legal found a similar to put my books are on the air.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- So when you say.
And aren't Jews can't correct that -- vote over.
Barack Obama did you actually need to get a choice between Barack Obama.
And sent -- -- can you would vote for the inanimate object.
Well that's absolutely right there is no way that I would vote to.
To continue to fundamentally transform America there is no way I would vote to continue to want power man who has who has imperial designs on the presidency -- -- demonstrated.
That and there's no way I would vote -- -- -- Who would corroborate a society that is that is so miserable for my children and grand commitment that's absolutely correct.
Or I don't wanna put you down as it may -- -- the president.
Markets always a pleasure thank you very very much -- sporadic problems mark within best selling off he's a hell of -- radius of two men.
Mental -- all right.