Fast & Furious: Who has the moral high ground?
Media content to sit on sidelines
- Duration 6:53
- Date Jul 2, 2012
Media content to sit on sidelines
Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
We'll -- back so folks on the left it in the media same thing really.
Say -- that's -- scandal is motivated by partisanship and hatred for President Obama.
I -- see why for some people they might be right.
But that perspective holds true then so does the reverse that the casual dismissal of -- -- is also political.
Motivated -- partisanship and a love for President Obama.
So politics is behind in pursuit of truth for the Terry family.
But also behind it distancing from the truth whose side to to be -- seems to me that after the accusations of political patty cake played out your left -- the dead American exports and that Mexicans all due to arming criminals partisanship on either side doesn't change any of that.
But only one kind can answer for itself I wanna pick -- side knowing both side -- political why not go with the one that seeks to answer the question desired by grieving family.
Being politically motivated to say it's not a big deal doesn't hold.
So where are book Woodward and Bernstein now tell someone -- call Martha's Vineyard and tell them to put down -- producers and step up.
If bush had done -- they'd be trying and in The -- by now.
Why aren't the answer -- we had very convenient.
What I have seven yards on following what was -- and I think is believed that right now they're saying that they're saying that if you're pursuing fast and furious it's political -- Not pursuing it.
It is political that's the point tonight.
-- that that the whole model and a little bit about spat I don't have been.
Maybe it was just over your -- you don't believe me I got out of here I got I also gone yeah.
It's interesting notes hi I followed -- eating out get activated and have that it was and that does that but that's my luck I have and I actually just like.
I got -- my dad -- Internet that's four dollars right there but he followed me right.
I certainly did what did you make -- it.
I thought that it was political.
It was little -- thing a guy I don't frankly this being the last show in America Cecil following this story but that's -- you know you made this story the story now has come down to justice for one family of the tragedy.
I don't remember the media pursuing the tragedy of all those people killed in Iraq.
Who died under circumstances which never should have happened.
But what we are you talking about I'm saying that the people who killed in Iraq were -- -- ward didn't need to be.
Yet they and you don't think the media cover that -- racing Friday I don't.
Nobody that all -- -- they've made the outcome of the dependent upon one person and a few others involved my god well I W post it was a drip drip drip of of horrifying numbers I mean on Wall Street Journal it was -- -- It was everywhere but the dealt with the Wall Street Journal -- was it illegal war and we shouldn't do that.
Now up -- -- it honestly -- uncovered it in any paper at your time of the -- auditorium -- that would be a different thing but it got to say that.
-- -- -- you just said one person died I mean -- -- strategy Brian -- but.
-- you just ignoring the three or so hundred Mexicans that were killed that that the hands and I'm not ignoring the 50000 new Rabinowitz is a product orders being done OK not to do it fast secure what about the 300 Mexicans or kill them.
They don't matter is though I stood strict person -- every human being matters political hit.
It's also another 50000 this is a war that's going on issues as a project -- -- Iraq.
They would have gotten guns anyway but.
Okay -- you just argued against gun control.
What control guns that they can just happen anyway well I'd have to be there would there wouldn't be any guy that's but now I wish there were -- -- -- on the moon -- yeah I know you're not they're not some.
Well one day Kimberly and -- Why and where.
Well I contests at all -- all the constitutional scholars.
What they weighing in on this -- why did not import their crying and in morning I'll let let happen all that just doesn't operate that here's the thing I agree with that.
Your premise what you had to say in the beginning before it became nervous and conflict is getting -- I'm you looked -- out weeds at.
I don't want they're done.
Their band yes but here's how we ride that we have to get the justice whether it's a Democrat seeking -- or the Republican seeking in this investigation should be pursued it should go forward it should matter whether the death of one individual.
Or it's also the death of 300 plus individuals that's what bothers me about it because it's completely now been broken down to politically.
They were but -- have been -- the that is missing the point we can't even proceed Ford because the man is supposed to be the most transparent.
And -- justice is blind Eric Holder is refusing to turn over documents and I think that Boehner said that they have out there and settling crowding the how's he gonna to -- -- civil lawsuit.
They are they gonna go that got along the didn't bargain given discussed general announces that it and it hit.
You'll be able to ask shareholder question you but you think any of us would even be talking about this right now if they just turned over documents now another course that's a cover up that that's the most interest you -- should -- insiders -- honoring our Michael constitute only you know I don't exactly know what the documents said we would not there was in fact the cover up or there was shock them right so those documents.
As -- -- to be cut and I this is as not you know they like.
Because they admitted that they said -- we know is on -- by images are that's the point they that Droid that they initially said one thing.
Sometimes later they set another thing and it due to congress on the record.
But people haven't been.
Asking is what happened in that intervening time I don't think that is.
And reasonable clintons and the fact that they know it but they won't -- hit.
Even if they're just to do it knocked out of the documents but -- -- it's done which is what has happened before in an accommodation I think that's probably -- that whether they will end up at a public will happen before the election as it at all they say that -- -- you know what we're gonna turn over on what we feels affair compilation and and you -- it isn't want they sit at that somebody politically but it of the.
And that was it didn't existence on -- that it did obviously somebody did know one and so they had to correct themselves.
In the interim they just try to figure out what happened right I still contend that they found out -- somebody blew it and and holder decided to cover for.
Those are out there.
Well over what hello goes through it wasn't like -- not why not -- -- said that legendary.
I just -- covered I don't.
I saw that they decided he -- -- attorney general is probably there was a -- discussions which had no right to be why -- -- the -- united and he turned MOR and step why.
-- Doing right now unit and it eject my turn dangerous and you think -- -- the right of the executive editor of the what's that the next thing holder's gonna cover it Bob what's the next thing on that.
That's up to point the point isn't so protect isn't -- protection of internal documentation and -- -- The discussion between administration official is something that should keep in the exact.
Unspecific as it's not that I -- tiger has no right to out well I'm gonna turn over in my dream journal.
I wanna -- -- come.