You're watching...
O'Reilly responds to ObamaCare prediction
Details
-
Description
'Factor' host apologizes for prediction and Bernie Goldberg reacts
- Duration 5:46
- Date Jul 2, 2012
You're watching...
'Factor' host apologizes for prediction and Bernie Goldberg reacts
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advanceThis transcript is automatically generated
Thanks jealous -- Bill O'Reilly in the week -- -- Bernie segment tonight the far left smears site media matters making a big deal.
Out of this.
This is absolutely and it's absolutely -- force it's actually police powers from the federal government and it's going to be five before.
And if I'm wrong all of -- play I will play your clip and I wolfpack -- -- being an idiot.
Okay.
I'm not really sorry but I am a man of my word so I apologize for not factoring in the John Roberts situation.
Truthfully I never a million years that the Chief Justice would go beyond the scope of the commerce clause to -- and into taxation.
And may be an idiot for not considering that.
-- -- have a North Carolina purveyor Bernard Goldberg dot com mr.
Goldberg self some far left Kooks on MSNBC run with that club also our pal Howard Kurtz of CNN.
Once again does the bidding of media matters and you said.
I say that you may be many things bill.
But naive isn't one of them you should have seen this coming you're a big name in the culture on a big network.
And you made a big loud prediction.
So of course they were gonna go after you.
But not for journalistic reasons this is trivial.
As far as journalism is concerned are you made a prediction and you got it wrong that's no big deal everybody made a prediction.
They're going after you for entertainment.
Reasons.
It is great entertainment.
To go after Bill O'Reilly who's got a target on his back you gave them the ammunition.
It comes with the territory.
My advice is except it.
Smile.
And move I did I I mean except -- -- I don't I'm not.
Mad about it I I do think though that a guy like Howard Kurtz to.
It's a background in journalism and media MSNBC people and you know the left wing bloggers and all -- that we don't.
Really care what they said.
But Kurtz does the bidding of media matters and and I don't know maybe I should just ignore that and as you say move along down the highway.
But if it's disturbs me a little bit he certainly knows what that organization is in business to do certainly knows that there.
-- and there are tax exempt organization that -- -- to hurt people with whom they disagree that's what they wanna do yet he didn't see empowers them and like that.
Look yeah well he I think you're I think you're being too sensitive.
Number one nobody on ESPN when -- you.
Nobody on the cooking channel and -- -- you -- however -- Howard Kurtz does a media show so of course he's gonna mention that.
I mean it's no big deal you as I say I'm -- -- -- powering media matters is not the first time that he's picked up stuff from them.
Yeah and it's not the first time that people on the right anchors on this network and a conservative talk radio.
Get their cues from the Media Research Center.
These -- -- groups.
On the left and on the right and not media watchdog groups -- political.
Activist group don't you see a difference between the Media Research Center and media matters you have yet yet the big difference is the guys at the Media Research Center are nice guys.
And the guys -- media matters aren't such nice guys.
Who would find no further goes by by not look the differences of the Media Research Center.
Does numbers they do numbers and OK that's not the point that yeah.
None none -- yes it is they do numbers and they and yes they come -- a from a conservative point of view there in business to make the liberal media look bad no doubt about it.
But the media matters people they want to hurt you personally that's right they wanted to destroy you guys let's see guys from any easier -- -- I don't see that.
I agree that's the big difference bright.
Well no but I've always agreed with that but here's the thing you have to groups that pass themselves off as media watchdog groups.
But the but one of them only goes after conservative bias and the only the other one only goes after liberal bias.
I want a group out there that goes after bias for crying out loud I think -- -- -- -- the Project for Excellence in Journalism or something -- DC I think they would try to do that.
And so do his -- around but -- don't -- velocity.
I want my friends at the Media Research Center.
That -- of great job.
A fantastic.
Job of exposing liberal media bias and are decent people because I know I know more than a few of them.
I want them to look at both sides they'll never do it because their money will dry up if they do justice.
Just -- media matters won't do it because their money will dry -- if they do.
But that's the media landscape I'm hoping for but I'm not holding my breath all right did you watch a lot of the coverage.
-- health -- decision last week.
Yeah did you see joy in my bill.
-- yeah I think I did okay -- here's what here's what here's what I saw basically.
Ten seconds.
It's ten seconds.
Before the decision came down.
And liberals both in and out of the media but I watched on TV mainly liberals in the media.
Were portraying.
Chief Justice Roberts as a right Winger presiding over the most partisan court in recent American history.
And ten seconds after the decision they were portraying him as Oliver Wendell Holmes all of a sudden he was a great statesman.
But you know a -- and next year next year.
The Supreme Court is likely to hear cases.
An affirmative action same sex marriage.
And voting rights.
And if John Roberts -- with the conservative majority.
These same liberals that love him today -- think he's a bomb just as they thought he was a bomb a couple of days ago all right okay.