You're watching...
Lis Wiehl and Deborah Blum on how the Supreme Court's new term is shaping up to be as important as the last one
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance
This transcript is automatically generated
Welcome back to on the Honda foxnews.com.
Live -- for the legal -- hole least we'll all.
-- -- legal -- you knew very well and also -- blown criminal defense attorney joining me here is you did this evening and thanks for being here.
-- -- -- Supreme Court back -- session.
And we go to law -- -- don't get this time there taking up the health care legislation again how so exactly but hasn't it.
Decided that that's gonna get back in front of the Supreme Court it's just they ask the Obama initiation of the department of Jack face to issue.
Agree.
Whether or not they should have a rehearing.
I'm a health care issues but it's.
Wasn't the only end there aren't really -- -- -- This is decided why we wanted to do was.
And you're right it's a it's a very narrow.
At a -- what question they're asking for a -- that one card that they said.
You know we're not really sure how this is going to be decided it'll probably have to go back to the lower court that's -- stop and asking for papers.
Provision rate does its integration right immigration.
So uncertain about healthcare and -- -- -- -- -- -- first good health care though if people can come forward and say look we are damaged -- -- run then they would have standing and it could be revisited second same with that immigration he got.
Basically that's like I can do is basically these two prongs and -- big huge issues that if someone can come by and come back and say.
I'm damaged now it's right for me to be be heard on a different -- so.
-- -- hanging over religion is that the religious group that asking -- to be -- Iraq but this it and the damages cases.
Validity university that we got yes today.
And let me just -- -- this -- Obama -- is the biggest funding of a -- of abortion in American history this abortion mandate.
Collides with -- -- religious freedom and the rights of conscience I'm very pleased with the court's decision that was -- mass save it was founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.
And dean of Libby liberty university's.
-- you only get one shot back on I think this issue has already been hurt and we shouldn't allow -- jet.
IDS encroach upon people's rights and affordable health care which is essentially what that woman there's -- a problem with what was almost decided to quit.
-- health care because there was nobody that really had been damaged nobody could say my right -- fundamental infringed upon my religious right.
Now with this you're coming forward saying now that obamacare is going in hundreds -- go all the way -- -- until 2014 but now that it's the incremental meet me and enacted.
I am being damaged for a group of us are being damaged that gives them something more to go back to the Supreme Court where.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Come -- it's it's one that we thought it was dealt with but it's not big comes back because all -- Well I think immigration as a very hot topic because.
So many things that fact that by AD.
Fact that we have large communities of people here that are here legally summer not here legally -- it affects the whole nation.
And this is always going to be a hot topic whether it's been decided not decide it's always going to be trying to come back to the point that -- really -- -- is -- is that -- As small as a small provision.
And this is what's gonna happen the ACLU or some other organization is gonna say look we -- damaged by this so we had.
Now we -- a case we don't need that Angel now it is right because of the Supreme Court said before it's not right not right what got no piece of fruit but right like you can't make this a legislative cant bring the Supreme Court yet because you can't show the one individual many individuals have been -- Once -- -- can be shown.
And I should be -- -- the groups will say that very quickly clearly.
Then the Supreme Court has been right not the obligation to take that case on you like think they're -- -- -- take this on.
In this go round.
My guess is not be my guess is they're looking at affirmative action they're looking at a lot of different issues right now some polling issue some voting rights issues.
I think will take precedent as far as you know what -- country needs to be looking at the right now legally let this -- -- the other two cases kind of faster a little bit but let -- lay fallow for a little you have have groups come forward with these freaks that are well done.
Debra we're so also possible ruling on gay marriage.
It is this the if we get to that are we getting to the finals who pretty col wood on gay marriage or -- -- her disadvantage.
And in our economy that's and it constantly re emerge however at this juncture because many states are something in the lab for gay marriage.
I think the federal government has the -- -- I am.
It should go in front Supreme Court right now it's not clean it but it's whether or not still.
Is we do about being MS that -- -- -- its dominant defense of marriage act that prohibits.
Dean's brother that are married and having federal rights that straight people that are married.
And it's a little bit more nuanced than that I'm sure you'd agree with me that there's -- whole proposition eight Southern California.
And that's not gonna go before the Supreme Court I think it's really clear that issue that one double for Supreme Court what it is they'll make -- -- -- I like I respectfully disagree I think the proposition eight could very well go to from the Supreme Court because Supreme Court house is left to deal with whether or not.
He was legislated that it was brought down by the time the judges and that Supreme Court can come back and say no you can't do that judges you overstepped your grounds your barriers there.
