You're watching...
Ellen Ratner discusses how the liberal media's coverage of the final debate may have been colored by its support for Obama.
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance
This transcript is automatically generated
Let's bring in -- -- and out of bureau chief of talk radio news service now Alan good to see.
-- daily last flash and I'm happy to have you seen the the media having -- Lost lives and I just run a play you just go for plainly welcome home it's lovely to have you back.
So I was there and I tell you you know I.
Actually.
I'm a liberal everybody knows and but I spent.
A lot more time talking to Republicans and their analysis the last night because.
The liberals were just like at some point they were kind of boring they didn't say anything interesting.
Anybody -- -- interesting.
I'm -- Kelly I -- I EO I never could pronounce your name correctly from Tampa and that the senator from and from New Hampshire.
Actually was the most interesting person I talk to she really talked about the effects of sequestration.
In her area.
I found a few interesting things one is and they -- to there was an analysis I'm Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
And it was -- it it was pretty interesting about the fact.
That she was asked about the kill list and dealing with admit that the president hand and she basically said she had no knowledge -- That was a little hard to believe what was also interesting.
Achilles from being the list of people that we might at some point or another drew that's a bracket that we may -- into remember it exactly like.
I'm also I found it fascinating this morning I'm I'm on the plane and taking a look at the New York Times -- and and I'm also.
Looked at the hill -- hill news.
And both are using the word role reversal yet describing the presidential debate.
So here you have these two major news outlets talking about role reversal.
How come closer exactly using the same words and their headlines -- I found that suspect.
Too bad didn't get into which goes to the point you were making a golden that -- -- the role reversal I guess when we're talking role reversal.
We're talking backed President Obama acting more like a challenger by being more aggressive and Mitt Romney just wanting to not rock the boat because it -- -- -- -- that.
With a new and because Romney has had the momentum since the Denver debate and so this is really many of the narrative was that the president needed to knock off.
-- to change the momentum.
And you know I don't know whether he did it last night I think -- make some important points about.
You know the embedded messages to certain parts of this you know swing states but nonetheless you know you don't get the sense that Romney was there you know -- wrong it was like Obama and the first debate.
Maybe not quite as bad but clearly you know he just was ill advised I think in terms of how to deal with the challenging president -- lost.
Well the last one which is it I find it interesting handwritten.
The governor Romney said something about sequestration.
The if people would have gone -- on him.
But the president -- sequestration is gonna -- that was not.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- I would rather have your tickets already users thank you McCain campaigning coming straight again.
God gentlemen stick around to get travel to united Europe at center after the break up an element -- is one of those -- -- you can see weekly.
Three to 4 PM Saturdays and Sundays on Fox News -- hosted.
By John skull discussing the way the media covers politics in this.
Difficult -- in which we live thanks -- thank you to see your.
