You're watching...
Judge Jeanine: I don't believe in coincidences
Details
-
Description
The curious timing of CIA Director Petraeus' resignation
- Duration 3:53
- Date Nov 11, 2012
Advertisement
Clips
Also in this playlist...
Justice with Judge Jeanine
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance-
What did administration know about IRS scandal and when?
-
Judge Jeanine: The American people want the truth
-
Can Cleveland kidnapping victims recover, return to society?
-
Judge Jeanine: Benghazi whistle-blowers changed everything
-
Reaction to Benghazi whistle-blower's comments
-
Administration pushing 'lone wolf' theory in Boston probe?
-
Looking ahead at potentially explosive hearing on Benghazi
-
Boston bombing puts US system of granting asylum in focus
-
Judge Jeanine to 'mother of jihadis': We don't want you here
-
Judge Jeanine: Thank the next cop you see
-
Benefits to trying terror suspects in civilian court?
-
Where will Boston Marathon suspect be brought to justice?
Transcript
This transcript is automatically generated
I don't believe in coincidence never have probably never will.
-- it's the prosecutor in May or may be if I get a little older I get a little wiser.
But the timing of the resignation of CIA director David Petraeus.
Three days after a presidential election.
And just days before he is scheduled to testify.
Before congressional committees seems any thing bought.
A coincidence.
Hello and welcome to justice -- judge -- -- bureau.
Men have affairs.
They always have they probably always will.
Most of the time the ripple effect limited to immediate family.
But this time the ramifications.
Are volcanic.
When your the head of the CIA.
The national security risk and the pretensions counter intelligence disaster.
Can be nothing short of a political -- nominee.
Not to mention yet another roadblock in getting to the truth.
Of what happened to four innocent Americans massacred in -- Gaza.
Now we know what wasn't about a video we know the ambassador -- asked for more security even to the day he died.
We know the White House was watching in real time as our men asked for help.
But there's a lot we don't know.
You'll recall the CIA director initially -- along with the White House video narrative.
Although -- three days he indicated in private that -- was al-Qaeda connected take a look.
From what I understand that took place behind closed door sessions as he did provide the reality that.
A -- affiliated groups participated in the attack.
Then on October 26.
After the finger pointing began as -- who told -- woods to stand down.
And who made the decision not to send help the CIA issued this statement.
No one at any level of the CIA told anybody.
Not to help those in need.
Claims to the contrary.
Are simply inaccurate.
Now the CIA director -- key information.
Where it's not -- so when did the president know his CIA head was having an affair.
When did the FBI tell the president of its investigation.
And would the FBI.
Not known for its warm and cuddly relationship with the CIA.
Dare investigate the head of the CIA.
Win back out telling the president of the United States.
And all of a sudden we hear about it.
The investigation.
Two days after the election.
Now we know the poll abroad well that the general in the spring of 2006.
By 2008 pursue -- as part of her Ph.D.
dissertation.
And in 2010.
Was in Afghanistan.
-- him embedded with the military.
Win any -- he goes to an FBI investigation for senate confirmation as CIA director.
Do you really think.
But a poll abroad well connected with the general in 2006.
Embedded with him in Afghanistan in 2010.
That the FBI did not know what their relationship in 2011.
Which relationship -- and it's.
The FBI didn't.
No.
-- not know they know how often your dog.
Days.
If they didn't know why did they hold it -- now.
Why.
I don't believe in coincidences.
Never have and probably.
Never --
