A gross violation of your privacy by the press
Talking Points 1/7
- Duration 3:25
- Date Jan 7, 2013
Talking Points 1/7
Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Hi I'm Bill O'Reilly thanks for watching us tonight a gross violation of your privacy by the press that is -- subject of this evening's talking points memo.
By printing the names and addresses of Americans who can legally possess firearms -- journal news of Westchester county New York has put some people in danger.
The battered woman hiding from her abuser whose address has been protected by the ports.
The police officer whose family is now in jeopardy.
The witness who testified against the bad guy who was in jail and for years has been stewing about that -- And it's judges and DA's like me.
And now the threats from the newspapers action are even more specific.
I've been -- -- a meeting with Mike correctional officers and their unions.
They have inmates coming up to them and telling them exactly where they live.
That's not acceptable to me that shouldn't be acceptable to the public and Rockland county.
Well prison guards are trained to defend themselves many folks are not.
This one lady who's been stalked for years.
And Westchester County she finally found he's two years without the stalker contact that -- Two days after.
Released her information.
Hang ups all night long.
She lives in fear her three daughters.
And what does a publisher the journal news -- -- and think about all that well she won't address the issue.
She's hiding under her desk and with -- good reason.
Since 2005 the circulation the journal news has dropped nearly 50%.
It is a committed left wing paper in the recent election it endorsed 36 candidates.
It's clear this has and his running an ideological operation that wants to punish.
Legal gun owners.
Charlie -- -- losing Carroll Iowa has a question from his house.
Would -- be acceptable to her if you list of persons who receive welfare payments or unemployment insurance were published in -- newspaper.
-- -- I can answer for her Charlie now.
Reason -- and her crew publish the names of legal gun owners was to disparage them.
She'd never do that to Americans who legally receive entitlements because that would go against liberal orthodoxy.
There is no question that -- -- should be dismissed by the Gannett corporation but in the meantime.
Lose on the other side are issuing -- rats and publishing personal information about journal news -- That is also on except you will not win any debate by lowering yourself to a morally wrong position.
The journal -- violated the privacy of law abiding Americans period that is debris shame it'll never recover in the minds of fair minded people.
However by issuing threats -- trying to bring personal harm to those at that newspaper.
You lose a debate.
For example pres Obama actually benefited in the election because some of his opponents -- -- My ratings go higher when my opponents cheap shot and lie about me.
If your position is solid -- that don't act like a thought.
Janet has and has forfeited her place among responsible journalists -- should understand that and take appropriate action.
That's the issue nothing else and that's enough.