You're watching...

Is the public buying Lance Armstrong's narrative?

Details

  • Description

    Critics see lack of sincerity in confession

  • Duration 3:24
  • Date

Clips

Also in this playlist...

Studio B

Auto-advance: ON

Auto-advance

Transcript

This transcript is automatically generated

Joining us now -- Foxsports.com.

Columnist Peter Schrager and former US Justice Department official Doug burns who's a very fine lawyer.

-- why does this classic Lance Armstrong self serving narcissistic.

Manipulative.

And still trying to dictate the -- patty really thought I had I think arrogant okay insincere.

And almost an act again and they never stops Atlantic.

There are two women in this story -- Andrew and also Emma O'Reilly who whose lives he's ruined.

I mean these are people that has destroyed them have called an offer doping and he's -- -- these are not women of.

Well of high means and he's ruin their lives in last night.

Very you know off the -- smiling laughing making jokes.

His name is bad did and he isn't bad did it last night he came off was he is remorse -- really dubious here and other words.

Did you get the -- this guy is not at all sorry that he cheated just sorry got caught as a journalist and I've never covered -- directly -- -- fellow riders in the field and say.

He's a -- he controls a message.

And he's eight PR win so he's controlling in shaping the message in the future story as he does even last night going on Oprah Winfrey.

Picking his shot -- -- -- in the first interview and kind of a style how the style it's gonna look.

Over to -- job I think she did.

But I do think -- -- goes on on a show like this and that on sixty minutes is a different tone to that interview and you -- -- I'm sure that his lawyer like any good lawyer told him to shut up don't do this because you're in legal jeopardy not civilly alone but criminally as well I mean.

They could resurrect the money laundering and drug trafficking right.

That's -- like there was a an investigation in the US attorney's office in Los Angeles.

Which was described as being abruptly shut down the worst kind of scratching their heads and the reality is of course that could reopen that.

Additionally there's what you call they relayed her or keep tam lawsuit that was filed under the false claims act and basically saying that he defrauded the government.

The Postal Service because your relationship whistle blower case brought by Floyd Landis Floyd Landis brings the Casey remains sealed the while the Jim Justice Department.

Investigates to six it is not take some actually yesterday was the deadline for the government.

To come in or not so on some might have gotten advice well that's why can do the chart and I -- guess what they extended another six and yet.

Yet he can also get nailed for perjury you need testified and wrote he never -- so -- only -- had I think there.

Our potential statutes of limitation I have the defamation I mean he defame all kinds of people they could sue him now well it's similar statues have not run two points number one.

He defame people.

Number true he -- I'm -- yeah he sued the British tabloid.

For defamation they forked over half a million dollars and now I'm coming back at him and the for that I want to get the plaintiffs settled the suit knowing that what they printed was true not false.

So of course they can reopen the settlement motive here and for our.

Peter he probably ignored his lawyer.

Because the cheering crowd stopped he missed the adoration he couldn't compete any longer.

So this is Lance trying to do wouldn't deal get rid of the life time bans liking compete last ditch effort hey look he's that a half his life to live most likely he wants that -- -- -- played here in starting new and become this redemption story.

I'm not sure the American public I'm not sure the world wants to accept that -- a little too late too much damage the -- burns Peter -- good to see you both guys thanks so much.