You're watching...
Controversial columnist Erick Rush explains to Alan why he believes the Obama administration is slowly taking away our freedoms.
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance
This transcript is automatically generated
I'll talk with columnist and writer Eric rush's latest -- is the -- -- -- from -- Block to pedestal America's racial obsession he writes -- world net daily later on tonight activist and actress Daryl Hannah we are at 87736725.
268774.
Alan.
You get a lot of push back from your fellow African Americans -- because of the things you say and everybody thinking you could be liberal think if you're black.
Oh absolutely happens all the time.
-- announcements to be expected it goes with the territory.
No one of those people -- thinks because you're black you should walk in lockstep with the left necessarily and I think it's healthy to have people of all -- -- -- the political -- so.
Annulment of those people but made a anyway I appreciate you don't -- -- let's talk about the color -- which I think is what sparked.
Your statement that this administration merits being.
Taken out or or removed.
That by arms.
There is in Colorado now -- hasn't passed yet -- they vote tomorrow unless I'm trying to.
Yes there -- several of them that they're voting on and I think they've got some more and courses you know governor has to say.
Do blender magazine limit -- expanded background checks and a ban on concealed weapons.
And and this is the to say that this is unconstitutional no right is absolute the First Amendment sun apps salute the second member just to say you can't have laws regarding arms right.
But no it is not however there are.
You know there are.
It's certain tendencies that are taken into consideration you know you just can't say well.
You know by the same token if you if you can't say that it's unlimited but then again.
You know you have to have ample justification for the -- for doing something for example.
Mare much to my way of thinking unless he's committed.
Violent crime with a -- Or your mentally unstable.
You should be able to to have pretty much any firearm they.
Isn't that why you need universal background -- them.
Well yeah I had and I personally don't have that much of -- problem with very universal background checks the caveat being you know what is the criteria to those.
However it has been the premise a little bit of so many of these -- firearm laws aside from that background check I'm talking about the magazines.
And a lot of the things that go with baton if they have to do with the aid meant to representation of the Second Amendment.
The Second Amendment is to protect -- from a tyrannical government.
Bearing in mind.
My point of view on this administration.
I don't think that we -- -- ever been any any greater danger.
I don't mind that that just a government that that's really hyperbole you really think Obama's a tyrant -- -- -- if everything everybody who voted for Barack Obama had read dreams from my father I would I would.
I'm featured bit adapted two thirds of those people would not good for him to bury -- more evidence in there that he is a radical marxists then there is any where else aside from day.
The actions that he's taken and the policies that you implemented as president.
Well the call him a radical marxists as saying we're in greater danger now -- this.
We're endangerment too radical regime amazed at this it's OK to disagree with and I don't fault you for have a different point of view but this is just hyperbole do you know -- language.
No I don't believe it is I think it is so.
Plain stated it best opening bit more people have not picked up on the fact that he is a radical Marxist if you look at.
Not done anything that would indicate that he he would -- It indicated that they think this is done it throughout his administration.
That didn't think he had that they had spoken about is studying.
He says I Paul the Second Amendment but then if there then there is on record as saying that he doesn't think people should own -- Said that's a senator years ago you don't know why he does say there's president back he said over and over again he -- not and he doesn't propose legislation and furthermore.
Nobody saying anything about gun confiscation in this country are one or two people might say something about it but there's no legislation registration you know -- like confiscation.
Nobody is created this slippery slope to confiscation because only -- -- if they registered they all they have to do his billiard to go to your -- you've got to kind of where we're taking it now.
Could now with the law what -- what will they decide not to uphold when they when they come to get -- and Allen to put him in the cattle cars is that.
You're really fear that this is pretty Nazi Germany and then we have to worry about things when cattle cars and that this is like the Weimar republic where we are right now you're really -- Yes I do.
-- -- based on what this president has done and to think that he I mean.
There's there's so much out there they would have been if people would just look and see what what -- because president is doing they would come away with the content crackpot stuff this system that is the batter.
We're -- we have to do this -- -- stuff but I mean the U I understand this gets lots of attention when you say that the the administration merits being.
Taken out by arms I know they gets a lot of attention -- and it shakes people up and as a as a device for that I understand it but to believe -- -- -- you know you that -- provoke people when you say stuff like that.
Well EU spending do you know better than anyone and today you know -- -- -- -- that I didn't want to have people who've been on top of you know Barack Obama's story and his history.
-- more than anyone despite the fact that we disagree.
And I have to become a you know I was saying that he was gonna do things like this back in 2007.
And everything that I.
Do things like what proposed gun restrictions and -- proposed gun control legislation after we have.
The mentality -- your own state Colorado.
I think they capitalized Dana is it fear mongering that capitalizing on tragedies fear mongering.
Proposing laws pressuring.
Legislators.
Overreach with speed that -- of the federal government.
The fear among doing this say we've got to marxists in the White House.
Who's gonna take our guns away and we have to be prepared for it administrators that -- being taken out by force that's not fear mongering.
No not based on what he's done.
I think I think you know we can sit here all day long of course we don't have the time tonight if -- wolf this is what he's done this is what he's done this is what he's done and of course.
I'll say that -- that he's done it that this is indicative where he's going -- you can disagree.
I would -- which he's been doing but that this is how I read it and you could say it's friends and upgrade do you believe this.
You don't think you're in the mainstream -- -- -- you know that's not true.
Well anywhere we're obviously not -- -- agree on what the mainstream.
Well let me -- elected him for one thing I mean he got a majority of the vote he also and certainly the Electoral College landslide but he had a majority the popular vote and then in and among those who don't agree with President Obama they're not saying he's a radical marches don't take your -- They do not know what he's doing because it would be he would he would never been represented faithfully by the press in this country analyst.
And -- -- and I don't know I'm not people as stupid people have been.
It's been mr.
informed by designed by the press.
The good -- a 180 degrees away from what he has represented as being in the.
Say everything you're saying is right just as part of -- academic exercise -- everything you're saying is correct and he's out of office in three years.
And I then we have a new president and he's that terrible elect a Republican.
You think between now and 2016.
He's gonna ruin the country.
Absolutely.
-- -- Well for one thing they are already people -- -- already legislators who have been talking about saying doing away with you know doing away with the term limits on the presidency so he could stay in there.
-- -- -- -- I also think -- it is well within is the reason as it has been bitten with their -- -- Him diplomat for him to foment some sort of there is some sort of -- you know cataclysm.
He's a Marxist dictator who want to format.
Yes do whereby he had to implement martial law and you know I mean he could stay in indefinitely.
You think he's a Marxist dictator.
I think -- -- -- that it would be easy but that is what he's been in -- is big.
He is aspiring to be yes.
And you think that he's going to do some thing to foment.
Dissent that will require him to institute martial law.
I think it's of the it is strong likely.
And as a result of that we'll have to postpone the elections we could stay in office longer.
Why don't.
Do you what percentage likely -- would you say that it.
-- -- -- -- -- 50% chance of that happens well I hope we have a chance stuck again you know -- -- -- still live in this and -- -- -- -- we -- -- if -- right.
-- well -- it looked to -- -- -- through you know.
I do appreciate -- having the debate Eric you know you're -- at world net daily dot com which although I just -- much of what they -- -- funny great entertainment.
Your book is negro failure from -- block to pedestal America's racial obsession.
Thank you for coming on -- Always a pleasure take care.
