Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Well let's just go through -- the basics of the court hearing and what was the court during really about yesterday.
Well let me the government -- he says they -- and virtually -- younger religious organization cases.
Probably motion to dismiss claiming that I clients don't have standing -- they have not been injured by eighty contraception candidate candidate -- isn't right meaning at that time isn't right to bring a lawsuit.
Because the government can't claim and that they claim that you know February 2012.
And then again just recently in March and then I don't modify the candidates and -- there's going to be any religious accommodation.
Now that accommodate religious objection organizations like -- -- light.
To the HHS men and until that accommodation has been finalized.
Which they told us any -- we had a summer.
Nobody finalized sometime in and you know my actually it what's light according held here in April when it now tell us at least -- an audience so there are the court isn't until.
This accommodation has been finalized and that government knows exactly how they got in -- this.
Upon religious organizations and so that they are right.
The lawsuit is premature.
Solo lawsuits should be dismissed and -- forcing us to have to refile again sometime in August so it's really and procedural mechanism minute trying employee here.
-- by themselves not getting their act together and deciding how they want him to religious organizations.
By -- is shifting rules and regulations.
They're claiming that because it has been finalized.
The lawsuit is not right and -- the court on the business.
So we were sitting right now the courts decide whether or not he's not right because actually -- -- -- -- August.
Installation dismiss it and then -- then refile a new lawsuit well we certainly didn't ask these rules finalized we will.
Follow a lawsuit or we'll be told in advance mean you know you just keep on talking about all the activity in the case.
And tell these final visual finalize an artist.
And then will not proceed with the judge oh so we weren't -- really what they procedural.
Procedural matter but this is going to be coming to -- real soon.
And -- I didn't and shortly after August I think got a minimum.
So in effect you.
Are saying that the governor Scott stalling at this point -- absolutely and you know the deal.
These so called accommodation.
They announced the back instead orient and -- -- and marched.
Similar -- -- trees a light paid millions drawing the -- contraception sterilization and border stations run so that's really say it's an abortion anti -- wasn't contraception mandate.
Let me get insurance company paid for so if you have insurance without insurance company.
Going to be an effect you have that insurance than that insurance policy -- and provide those coverages but the government's claim that what it will be increased like that the paper -- -- -- The promise that it is is that these procedures aren't morally neutral priest like opposes I was in the Supreme Court said time and again -- even.
The compulsion from the government need not be.
Direct to create substantial burden on the list is -- -- -- can -- indirect as well.
And certainly you get decreased life now shorts if they want to have insurance or they -- for employees they do on an -- employees.
Then they must have insurance -- -- a -- of courage.
That is a choice -- -- moral dilemma because -- a constitutional dilemma.
And so if they you know I could -- this -- -- -- grounds it doesn't it doesn't usually you just need to get -- -- sometime in August.
I want to our viewers though I make to the we we did ask the health and human services department for comment on the case that was in court yesterday.
And they said they declined due to being an ongoing case so I want -- you know we actually did contact.
The Health and Human Services Department what things it's interesting though these you said that that that priests for life are not covered under the religious exemption.
They are a different kind of case why use them.
And he -- list exemption -- -- You know I think it was truly concerned and our religious accommodation -- -- how many feet.
You religious objections and just a -- like -- you probably know there's an art hosts.
I thought provocations.
And then moving forward because there's no argument and make any accommodation and but the exemption that they put in place the government put in place is so narrow it only applies to -- very few.
And nonprofit organizations -- -- in -- themselves.
Or religious orders priests for life is neither knows they are nonprofit organization that happens to be religious organization.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Somewhat to my organization is a nonprofit based I'll have to file -- 99 -- -- they weren't you religious order like that many are now or they were actually EC church a parish.
They would be exempt it.
But the government has not made an exemption brought enough.
Take cover -- -- religious organizations.
They don't fall into religious order -- better or they're not churches and they certainly cannot provide an exemption.
All you know organizations like hobby lobby for profit companies right right people.
-- -- -- So he did for profit companies are moving forward the government is claiming that there that I try to come up with some sort of accommodation for organizations like increased life.
Who don't fit into the exemption.
But they want to provide some measurement company.
That's why increase of one kind of falls in between that's -- property companies any actual churches themselves.
Just like a lot of the other schools may follow in the same category -- has increased a lot you know religious orders that no pictures themselves they're regular mystery that has -- -- -- nonprofits and so that -- an organization that groups.
There -- wings whether the government to decide.
What sort of combination and they're gonna provide in fact what they say it is.
The combination that I just -- oh yeah and a paper or an inch or any -- but that's distinction without a difference certainly -- constitutional.
Difference -- -- our usual -- -- -- with this judge or another judge Karen mark the end of August.
Filter by section