Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Thank god it happened a long time ago.
We are unaware of any agency -- in employee who would like to appear before congress to provide information related thing does anybody who.
He wants to be heard by congress is welcome to be heard by congress and our -- We've been asking for for months and they talk about all of documents -- sent -- -- Penalized when -- just send over the names so that these individuals who we could have the congress United States interview and it's still.
Now all these months later we don't have this information it is and make compelling argument.
For a select committee to investigate this whole.
Tragedy that took place which we still don't have answers for.
White house Press Secretary -- Ghazi happened a long time ago it happened.
Eight months ago and today the FBI on its website put up a picture.
Of three -- That the FBI says it's asking Libyans and people around the world.
To help identify three individuals who were on the grounds of the US special mission when it was attacked.
Quote these individuals may be able to provide information to help the investigation according to the FBI.
These -- the three pictures that they have put up they're seeking information seeking these men related to the attacks resulting.
In the four deaths included in the death of the US master -- panel.
-- And -- we have been a long time ago.
That's -- definition of Huntsman.
This administration has stonewalled every inquiry and delayed its answers and not release names.
And told all kinds of stories is now saying well it's an old story.
-- mean this is it I have argued for from the beginning the administration's strategies has always been.
Stringing out over time and count on the media the mainstream media be an interest in this story.
And that's who worked up until now -- -- what Hillary Clinton said after hearings what -- it -- what difference does it make at this point.
Well because if you wait that long.
The the evidence so -- but I think they're not gonna get away with it because I think the fact that there are people in the State Department who want to testify.
And now that it's out in the open that they are being at least the accusations.
The administration is threatening them I think in cases like that.
They are going to be allowed to go -- and testify and as we heard in the reports from Adam Housley.
There is stuff that happened there that contradicts at least according to people who -- there.
To that contradicts the official story and that's the way of the story of the unraveling -- -- -- Want you know I just love challenging authority and I love challenging government and people in positions of power.
The question is what it is yet.
And what are you know I mean that's just basic journalism and and persistence in journalism pays off.
But at this point when I look at what Victoria times and who's a friend of mine has she's not naming her client she can't say if they were on the ground or they hear.
Even in -- -- No we haven't we haven't heard anything about any whistle blower request to the defense or State Department know Ramirez few hours from where congressman Darrell NASA now retirement something else that's coming from the hill -- -- Time -- and says that she was going through -- with her initial request we haven't heard anything from state or defense that's on saying to your best that I -- -- -- that says oh you know I'm gonna have this hearing and we've seen nicely hearings before that didn't come to much.
Now Frank Wolf says maybe we should have a select committee hearing on security lapses around and guys -- five.
But what you're hearing not only from Hillary Clinton but from now the current secretary of state John Kerry is that there's been this tremendous motivation and spread of misinformation -- the question is.
Is there something real here and and that's the question it's okay to be persistent and -- is there's something there.
Well there has been tremendous politicization of this from the beginning and it happened at the White House.
We know that we know indeed tell the story about that the talking points as laid out and in the house report last week and as was evident to anybody who watched Susan Rice.
On the Sunday -- -- I mean I think it's it's your question directly there is new information here and that I think is one of the reasons that this will be.
But it is proving to be very difficult for the administration.
To ignore or to -- aside I mean we saw.
An administration that didn't even have the FBI didn't even show up and then got into October 4.
Nearly a month later we didn't have much urgency.
From the administration on investigating this certainly not at that time.
And even after the election in that time for him well in his -- there.
We -- help this week we had.
Adam -- -- one of the pieces dealt with us the hunt for the mastermind he said.
We know who it is we know where they are and then walking free.
Asked the FBI about its repeatedly this week.
Now we get.
These pictures today.
This is eight months later those are cameras from surveillance cameras on the consulate grounds eight months later but I mean and other.
What the -- said.
Was it result of that Fox News reporting absolutely not our plan was to publicize these photos is in the works for weeks in the decision to post these this morning was already made.
Long before your producer found it necessary to even call us.
Look you know it's a coincidence it's remarkable the number of coincidences around these event.
In the 200 some odd days since the attack.
It's possible that this happened to be one that at all that this all came out it happened to be the one that came out you know they have 200 to one.
Next week the hearing we'll see what comes -- -- covered here Wednesday that's it for the panel.
Filter by section