Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
The State of New York.
Is proposing new legislation to controversial that would allow young -- Steve -- -- -- without the consent of their parents and the justification for the proposed deal is quote allowing immunization.
To those under eighteen without the consent of apparent promotes health and well being a person's -- most critical time in their lives.
But our kids old enough to call for their own backs it vaccinations -- -- is the founder of my kids my choice she joins us now.
But thanks very much for joining us so this is basically let children self Medicaid without.
The authorization or even knowledge of their parents.
Yeah it would yes the -- for a shot or any HPV -- -- shot.
Would be able to be accepted by on children as young as nine without the consent or knowledge of the parent and the big problem with this is that especially in the case -- -- felt that the child does obtain a reaction as a result of the shot.
The parent is completely ignorant of the original action they have no idea what to do about this reaction you have no idea why came out.
And a nine year old or 1011 even a sixteen year old.
Isn't going to know their medical history well enough.
To ask the proper questions of the acting administrator for a while I have a history of state proud of this and Clinton are -- -- or some sort of other nerve disorder.
Within their their -- history.
So is so it's it's it's -- her rent between appropriate to administer these types of vaccines to children and as you point out there are dangers from vaccines.
Not all obvious in the vast majority are safe however there can be varies.
Bad reactions to vaccines and that you can't even -- -- get that vaccines for mumps or measles without your parents consent.
It's like you can't even get a -- New York State if you're under sixteen without the consent or knowledge of their parent of of the parent so how can you how can we.
-- believe justify allowing children 91011 years old he going get get a yet he.
The thousands of documented adverse events as a result of gardez so not to mention hepatitis B which would also be encompassed under this -- -- I will look confused -- I mean no one is suggesting that we let kids -- win and get a -- -- -- -- prescription without their parents' knowledge that would be insane.
Why would people be pushing for by the we get that vaccinated against other diseases why sexually transmitted diseases wire by the authors this -- anxious to allow kids -- well.
I think the mindset is that if if -- if -- thirteen or fourteen year old girl or boy.
On -- having -- and let's face it that's they do and they don't want to tell their parents about it yet they do want this purported protection.
They want the legislator wants these teenagers to have the freedom to do so.
My feeling is that.
Be the that the parental.
Knowledge and the parental guidance that we need to offer these kids trumps that absolutely chance that there is.
It's a parent's right to be involved right in -- you have kids at -- government is saying.
Parents have less authority than they did before -- and -- the that's a concern here if the child does have -- reaction.
We need to know what you did.
And we need to know to discourage them from getting that shot if there is some sort of history that we had.
Country indicate them from getting shot.
Well -- -- -- you are from my kids my choice thanks so much for explains listen thank you actually.
Filter by section