Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
That -- about segment tonight as we -- and it's not good points memo the Benghazi -- story is very important because.
There may be misconduct.
Misconduct by the federal government.
At a high level.
Who I don't wanna know about it and joining us now in Washington Fox's political analyst Ross -- -- -- -- I'm trying to be -- on this.
I'm trying to be fair on this story I don't want to be perceived as somebody was trying to do yet Hillary Clinton or -- yet President Obama.
But the thing that really really annoyed me was hicks when he said that he was -- -- For pretty much telling the truth and Hillary Clinton had a sign off on that that's that really got me and you saying.
-- -- -- story that's why this story change yesterday.
This story isn't going to explode this is a drip drip drip.
And what did drip drip drip there's about it is the administration.
Tried to suppress the truth about what happened have been guys.
And did that consistently.
And deliberately while the president at the same time.
Said publicly that -- only objective.
Was to collect the facts and to share them as they receive them.
With the American people.
Every piece of evidence that we heard yesterday.
Contradicted that this is not a hanging offense it's not a -- offense it's not a break in it's not a burglary.
It is an administration -- to cover up.
What was not.
The criminal act that could have been misjudgment and there -- But there was a lot of human error you can have some sympathy they might have made the wrong judgment about a rescue or not you have to balance it left and right.
So it was not that great -- I'm a mean of crime but they decided.
In the middle of an election.
What the president had proclaimed al-Qaeda is gone and we've we've conquered all -- the war on terror is over from a big hero Osama is -- even.
-- GM is alive and Osama is dead in the middle of a campaign where they're pushing this.
To maintain that line they would suppress the truth.
They would -- a hero like hicks they would shouted him that would threaten him.
They would not allow him to meet new congressional delegation all of these are things are part of a cover up.
And it's now a toss up real color -- did say you know what -- and we have to refresh people's memories a little bit the Watergate scandal.
Was because of the election Richard Nixon wanted to know.
Exactly home and was doing so they broke into the headquarters try to figure that out.
So this is the same thing they don't want the narrative that the terror warrior.
Had a slip up in Libya they didn't want that to be part of the election campaign that's what it's all about.
But that's the great irony of it.
US -- if -- -- order -- burglary or criminal act.
Or how to plot -- you've never had any -- it was simply to make him look I have to speculate because why else.
Would you have the assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs writer memo the day after the attack saying.
It was an attack by -- are -- -- the al-Qaeda -- so State Department admits it on day two.
Evidence it's evidence on -- before that it's all about a terror attack there is no speculation.
About a video there was no demonstration.
Why else would you create.
A false story that you announce on the five networks.
I mean there is no plausible reason is it beyond he's a possible reason is that they were trying to look.
Good good yet they don't want it directional campaign hammer to go after him because as you know Romney came out the day after the attack but it's very disproportionate and makes no sense but did admit there was some mistakes -- -- it was a bit.
Of course I don't and I really any forgiving in this climate 24/7 news -- You gotta -- -- -- like that up -- up but is it possible that this was done at a level.
I don't think it's possible in the State Department I think did Hillary Clinton had a know that hicks was.
You know in aired.
He was off the reservation that's a term they use -- -- she had a note.
And and she was OK with the demotion which is ridiculous but at the White House level it could've been guys in the campaign.
I mean we have to give the benefit of the doubt here right now do we not.
It -- in the members of the campaign.
Who doctored their talking points I'm not saying Obama sat down and he added today.
But the story that Jake Kearney has told that the only -- thing that was done by the political.
People on the talking points was to change one word I think embassy into facility or something.
Is ridiculous we know what happened in the no -- -- did that anyone who actually sat down and cheers that.
There's story they have put out.
This is the administration story we initially assumed.
Or start the evidence wise it was a demonstration and a video and as we learn the new evidence became a terror attack.
That is completely.
False they -- in the State Department in CIA everywhere as -- has said.
There was no demonstration was no indication out.
They knew was it terror attack they subtracted.
-- that we headed out find out if fans who.
Indeed that's what we did it it was high people in the White House and -- people -- stake in the I don't know all right draws thank you for.
Filter by section