Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
I acknowledged that this was -- The terrorists.
I'm not true -- that was President Obama trying to rewrite history yesterday about what he said immediately following the Ben -- terrorist attack now unfortunately for him.
-- the Washington Post Steve that claim for Pinocchio nose and used Obama's own words to prove her wrong now here's why the day after the attack which also happen to be.
One -- removed from the anniversary of 9/11 President Obama merely claim that acts of terror would not be tolerated.
He never directly called being Ghazi an act of terrorism and that's not all.
As the post points how President Obama was repeatedly given opportunities in the days after that to do exactly the right thing he didn't watch.
President this morning you you went out of your way to reward to use word terrorist in connection with the Libya attack.
Do you believe that this was it a terrorist attack.
-- it's too -- no.
Exactly how this came about what group was involved but obviously.
It was an attack on Americans.
Then I heard the Hillary Clinton say that it was an act of terrorism is -- what do you say well we're still doing an investigation.
I -- -- to respond to -- former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld -- new book rumsfeld's rules.
Lessons in business politics war and life in hit bookshelves today and secretary -- the sale of the book thank you gonna beyond specific related do a lot of talking about that.
-- the mysterious reluctance and resistance looking -- the twin was on the what two weeks later on the view went that day and spoke to the United Nations and still is blaming a video that we all know was a -- I can't imagine.
How a person could stand up there when everyone involved knew it was a terrorist attack it was the anniversary of 9/11.
The people were not demonstrators they were well alarmed.
And the idea that it was some how related to a YouTube video.
And and that that narrative kept being promoted I suppose it's because it fit their hopes and and what they wanted to be the case.
-- of anyone going was spontaneous demonstration and just haven't haven't -- back pocket rocket propelled grenade in and a rocket launchers and mortars that ever happens right not a chance all right but what we do know is that.
The testimony last week but mr.
In the last conversation that he had with ambassador Stephens investor -- under fire where -- -- being attacked.
And they never even spoke two weeks later when the president was on the view.
He'd never spoken to mr.
hicks -- anybody else.
That testimony before the congress was moving it was emotional it was first hand account of what actually took place.
And it -- it.
It can literally trashed.
The narrative that had been promoted by the White House the CIA.
Got it right from.
The next day.
They knew and those on the ground -- testified last week they knew was an attack the CIA knew was an attack they wrote the original talking points.
Twelve points later the truth was removed.
And this huge lie about a YouTube video and spontaneity.
And was inserted.
How does that happen but even go back to the beginning the brits knew that there was a danger and they pull their people out.
The people in the United States.
In May have been does he knew that there was a danger and asked for additional security and the CIA warned them and one more element to that that we learned last week.
Now it's it was a terrible tragedy and people lost their lives and and the way it's been handled since then has.
Has compounded the problem because because it it the first rule of something like that is to gather the facts.
And then inform the American people on the truth -- don't we deserve the truth always big moment in our system we -- to right so before they screwed up because they denied the assistance that the CIA said -- given the people on the ground requested.
Do worrying we have two separate stand down orders we still don't know where they came from you imagine Americans under attack.
Other Americans ready to risk their lives to help them.
That's why these hearings have got to go forward they're gonna have to call the people up they're gonna have to find out precisely what capabilities existed.
Because the first problem was not protecting people when they knew they needed protection.
The second problem was not assisting them when they were under attack and in the third part is a lie and the -- -- the you have any doubt it's a life.
You don't it if you've been around Washington too long was dissect our I don't -- -- -- enough well.
It's -- harsh word.
And I think that that the -- this will prove what actually took place.
And is no question but the narrative that was put out after the fact.
Days after the fact weeks after weeks after the fact is not true what's false.
What if this was you.
And George W.
Bush was president.
-- everyone blames George W.
Bush for everything so thank -- Even years later that the dog bites of the -- they ended -- -- said it's -- -- -- -- I've never seen a situation like that my life and of course he hasn't defended himself he.
He's been quiet -- and has not wanted to respond and I can understand that.
But yeah I wish she'd go and he deserves -- fair -- -- get shot back once -- -- verbally and yes go after about.
Archuleta told the playbook and and the days to come we're looking forward and -- a one hour special with a studio audience with the U.
Fantastic among -- -- of -- thank you very good to see appreciate --
Filter by section