Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Eric Holder says the Justice Department had to check the at Casey's phone records in the name of national security would that have happened if someone -- -- bomb illustration.
Had leaked the story in the first place Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson junior here -- -- they said they had the look you got twenty reporters.
A hundred different lines in order to find out every week his final story because we had a Saudi.
In a year many cell and the Saudi want to blow up an American plane yeah and did the Obama administration leaked this stuff in the beginning and then throw the mainstream media under the first among men that bus.
Now the First Amendment seems to be the -- occupation of the media it was hit on the issue of religious liberty in terms of obamacare.
The Second Amendment was a joke for them in terms of gun rights -- in the United States and now they're saying.
Almighty -- What's happening to us you destroy our ability to be reporters to be journalist to have sources you're trying to chill.
And intimidate Obama administration.
And see what's really disturbing about it is you probably the guys that gave us the story in the first place let's look at how this happened.
This happened because congress said the Obama White House.
What do you dealing with all these national security leaks and so attorney general holder said what we've got to a point a couple of US attorneys to investigate this and so we have these subpoenas these secrets the secret seizure of phone records of the Associated Press without notice perhaps in violation of -- -- rules.
And now the mainstream media the near times the Associated Press.
Is losing it because they said.
And we didn't realize that the Obama administration had no regard for the constitution.
Even senator Harry Reid contents -- I have trouble defending with the Justice Department did and looking at the -- I don't know who did it.
Why it was done but it's inexcusable.
There's a lot of Democrats who were upset by this should have said about it because it it goes to the heart of the United States constitution the First Amendment the freedom of the press the bulwark of our democracy what keeps us free the ability to look at -- government and say you're doing something wrong and we found out about it.
And we how did it.
But the Obama administration for its own purposes.
Is now saying oh yeah the First Amendment yet counts.
We're for freedom of the press.
But did they do the right thing.
The real issues what prejudice would there have been to the federal government.
To tell the Associated Press.
And the reporters at their home and cell phones.
And twenty different lines that we're looking at two months' worth of records for a time in the past would have been a prejudice in -- the investigation.
General holder says -- at the time that the the plot was unveiled on the story was published.
The wife has said there was no threat to Americans now there's a threat to Americans so the First Amendment had to be abrogated.
Whose double crossing.
Whom here right there which is instinct to his attorney -- -- I wasn't the one authorize it because I was the one who knew about.
I knew the players.
I would be I was interviewed as a possible leak or slide to recuse myself in the case.
Pull -- mister Coles he is now on the line a fired -- the turn unfortunately we in the media now understanding what other Americans -- understood in terms of the aggregation.
Of constitutional rights.
In this country now the First Amendment being affected and then mainstream media is squealing and they should be -- Game on game on.
All right thanks so much Peter Johnson Dave -- twelve minister.
Filter by section