Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
So White House also under a lot of pressure from both sides of the -- and also from some former top Obama advisors yesterday.
They did finally release 100 pages of emails that were related.
To the talking points.
That follow the Ben -- terror attack the internal documents show.
Some of how the Obama administration crafted the final story line that ended up in ambassador Susan Rice -- so called talking points.
On the now infamous -- Sunday morning shows that that weekend -- Roseanne has been on the since the beginning he's -- the State Department this morning with some more details for us.
She is Republican lawmakers say that the white house Press Secretary Jay Carney they believe.
Has lost his credibility.
In some of the exchanges that he's have this issue is there any basis.
For that charge.
Martha good morning Jay -- of course serves at the pleasure of the president that said some of his prior statements from the White House podium.
About Ben -- and about the White House's involvement in the shaping and reshaping of the altogether twelve versions of these now infamous talking points.
Do appear to be flatly contradicted by some of the information.
Contained in these emails here is one such statement.
But the only that it's made by -- even here at the White House were stylistic and non substantive they've.
Corrected the description of the.
Building where the facility in Benghazi from consulate to diplomatic facilities.
And the line.
But at 6:48 PM on that fateful Friday September 14 National Security Council spokesman Tommy -- emailed his interagency colleagues.
To alert them that John Brennan that a White House counterterrorism made now CIA director quote will have edits.
Four minutes later still fairly early on in the process of drafting these talking points.
Peter emailed out Brennan's edits which included -- -- CIA's assessment that the attackers -- quote from across many sectors of Libyan society.
Is -- at numerous points in these 94 pages of emails where you have the FBI and CIA expressing with high confidence that al-Qaeda was involved in the attack more.
-- all of which was clearly in the initial version of those talking points so.
You also have a lot of input that is revealed in these emails James and from the State Department as well right.
More in fact then than the administration would have us believe at one point -- CIA official writes in these emails.
But the State Department post quote major reservations with much -- most of the talking points.
And adds we revise the document with their concerns in mind then State Department spokeswoman Victoria -- and was a major player in this that evening of September 14.
She email to complain about the CIA's expressions of certainty.
About the nature of the attackers.
At 7:16 PM -- and emailed.
The line about knowing there were extremists among the demonstrators.
We'll come back to with a podium how do we know war they -- -- And then about 23 minutes later without any reply to the earlier email -- road again this time saying.
I just had a combo with the redacted name and added on that basis I have serious concerns about all the parts highlighted below.
At another point in the emails -- and makes reference to quote my buildings leadership.
Meaning the leaders here at the State Department having -- consultations with the national security staff.
About these talking points for those consultations.
We have at this hour Martha.
No documents at all.
And it's clear that the State Department was concerned about the suggestion that there had been are -- reality that there had been an prior attacks.
-- diplomatic posts say in Libya and they wanted that out.
I and a number of other things James thank you very much got a lot more coming up on this over the crime next a couple of hours --
Filter by section