Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Context and perspective now on where this trial goes from here in the criminal defense attorney Monica Lindstrom is live -- -- -- good afternoon.
I -- Harry -- I'm good before they impanel this next jury that they're they're gonna have a conference of sorts.
Where the lawyers get together with the judge that's gonna happen in June what happens there and what are the possibilities.
Well it's called a status conference -- and basically everybody's gonna get together and they're gonna look at the status of what needs to be done.
Are there any defense motion -- as a change of venue motion that they need to look at discuss argue and rule upon.
Are there issues regarding a jury questionnaire when this original jury was chosen back in December of last year.
They had to fill at a jury questionnaire so it's likely that will be done again for this new -- And then -- gonna look at dates and times in his July 18 a realistic option.
Or does America -- -- need a longer cooling off period before they try to choose a jury that.
I would guess that they're not gonna try to find people who haven't heard about this case the number of people haven't heard about it -- gonna be very small but -- where would you suggest that the parameters might be.
I mean if you've heard -- areas speaking since this penalty phase began.
Should you be -- well.
All -- You know -- the first place I would start the first question would be.
Do you follow social media.
Are you on Twitter do you follow people on Twitter and how about face but now I know lots of people have personal things online space but.
But do they follow the Talking Heads or the other social media people.
And more importantly did they have a Twitter account where they have actively talked about this case.
I think that's very important because so much information has gone out there with social media -- I was wanna be attorney is.
I would -- -- really delve into that area and that's where I would start and then perhaps go to did you see any of her interviews.
Most importantly fit any of this impact how do you think or had he made an opinion yet.
-- I was wondering if if the the fact that they had heard from -- areas of it that this judge lifted the gag order during the penalty phase which really baffled a lot of legal servers.
Yes and the only thing I can think of why she did that was because she thought it was over when it was handed to the jury.
I think most of us thought that there would be -- decision there would be a unanimous verdict so go ahead take think gag order Ott says that the players can speak or at least -- -- can speak because.
If they had given her the death penalty she would have been whisked it right away over to Harry -- prison.
And once on death row you cannot get any types of interviews so then there's some concerns about her First Amendment right to an interview and to make statements I think all of that -- together.
Led to the judge's decision.
Criminal defense attorney Monica Lindstrom money you'd see again thank you thank --
Filter by section