Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
I know -- Riley gave thanks for watching us and I'd hate speech in the IRS scandal lattice is subject of this evening's talking points memo if you surf the net.
Or listen to talk radio you know.
This -- a hatred being spewed.
FaceBook having a terrible problem with data recently hatred against women.
This caused a major controversy.
Postings have encouraged violence rape other atrocities against one.
FaceBook acknowledges it has not been able to control hate speech problem and all you gotta do is go in there and you'll see the most vile personal attacks -- -- is becoming commonplace even acceptable in some quarters.
The net even encourages.
To -- people to do these things because they can vent -- hatred and remain anonymous.
Segue to the iris -- At this point there is no doubt that one of the most powerful federal agencies abuse the Tea Party and other conservative and it's no question about it.
Because some people inside the virus apparently hate conservatives and want to hurt that.
Remember there are two kinds -- hatred the internal client which all of a struggle.
And the actual demonstration of maps trying to -- other people because you hate them.
That's what's rising in America.
FaceBook is making one major mistake however it is limiting its campaign against hate speech to specific groups.
The face of the corporations is quote while there is no universally accepted definition of hate speech.
As a platform redefined the term mean directed serious attacks on any protected category of people based on their race.
Ethnicity national origin religion sex gender sexual orientation disability or disease on quote.
So what FaceBook is essentially saying is those groups are protected but everybody else.
Can get -- Now that's wrong hate speech is not a difficult thing to identify it's based on personal attacks designed to -- That's hate speech and FaceBook -- Sad fact is there is an audience for that.
But in a noble country a noble country hate speech and those who traffic -- it should be rejected and Sean and indeed she lost country.
The abuse of federal power to punish conservatives or anybody else.
Should be across.
Now the top story tonight they're currently three so called scandals and play the IRS federal snooping on reporters in the assassination of Libyan ambassador Christopher Stephens.
What does not discuss those situations a former Republican vice presidential candidate.
Congressman Paul Ryan so with the IRS -- on the house ways and means committee -- going to be investigating that yes that's right our what's gonna happen going forward.
-- there for things we know right now I'm number one we know they targeted people face in -- political beliefs not just Tea Party groups were religious groups as well that were conservative in nature number two.
We know they're intimidating harassing donors to these conservative groups number three.
We know that the IRS leaked sense of taxpayer information.
Which was venues publicly to -- donors -- number four.
We already know that the congress that the -- misled congress the you don't know who exactly how did it part of that was to get -- started last week in.
Interviewing and -- and and doing depositions so.
Our investigators are -- low level RS employees were working our way through the system right and we're -- given documents we've requested.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Number one if they lied to your committee that's a federal that's right right.
Number two if they don't hand -- they being the IRS the Internal Revenue Service the documents that you want that's crime and we'll subpoena them in that case that they don't OK but when you say will subpoena -- make -- they wanted to do it anyway that's happened before.
Then they can be charged with a crime correct OK so you have added a criminal capability different.
Now you're thoroughly convinced this is just not a Cincinnati dealer a couple of rogue IRS people don't -- -- that's pretty clear it's pretty clear that it's more systematic than that that you got to grind out.
Whether it was just contained in the IRS.
All right in the slowest learner she's a big player here and she's gone.
Or was ordered from the White House I mean basically that.
That's what you gotta find out there we don't know the answer back so we're gonna let the facts take us there we're artists as you should.
And we -- do our job -- -- the legislative branch overseeing the executive branch this is an arrogant abuse of power.
It's really quite by somebody but by somebody right by the IRS for sure the question is what we do not -- what this investigation will bear out and that's why we -- Interviewing all these various -- employees getting the documents.
The IG is now doing an investigation not they didn't audit Bryant doing in investing -- inspector general now the lowest learning you know her she's wanted to say yes right okay.
So if you give her immunity.
Your -- house ways communities say look wrestler would giving you immunity can't be prosecuted she -- had asked to testify in front of the past -- compelled by law to correct in my right well -- yet a sheet that therefore there's no reason to take the 51 -- -- she says I'm still not gonna testify could you.
Tortuous open I think that's the case that's that's right right.
Here's here's the that's what you should -- just aren't ever Hannity we can we have a lot of people telling -- do would do -- -- I initially did the investigation and nobody is Smart as me.
Every kid that actually tallies get it rarely hear any -- -- -- But you -- Squealing is less ironically we're doing this the right we were not this is not a partisan -- and they should get to the facts get to the -- -- you have and all the facts and that's why we're taking this investigation extremely seriously -- -- to be given how long this is -- -- does it take months.
All right so -- -- the rest of 2013.
He probably I don't wanna put an end date because I don't know where the facts will take us hold you want him to quit.
Should he quit you're looking get a sense of matter who's of the close -- -- mind.
Wanted the giants in the in the legal community a member of the Judiciary Committee call for his resignation as so did you have -- defense theory and so and so look I think.
I want went up when -- put a legal challenge in -- matter who knows this agency extremely well says this man has has gone beyond the -- of his office site I agree with that so you think he's gonna resign and not only -- and I Axelrod said over the weekend Axelrod -- -- not speaking for the president had no idea if he's gonna resign -- -- look.
We think what his testimony was before the judiciary contradicted the actions he made.
Just like the testimony of the acting commission the IRS contradicted.
What we now know he knew at the time so we -- two instances here.
Where were people from the administration came in misled congress.
Ice is paralyzed -- -- congress genuine.
Is subpoenaing all the documents to the State Department try to find out about -- -- right right that's a Smart -- -- -- got -- -- right that's right that's right so what year of those tournament guys you most most Americans don't know the story which is.
They knew right away because the number two man in charge Gregory hicks said that this was a terrorist attack rice had nothing to do with -- video they didn't believe him yet yet they push this story for for days and weeks.
And the question is who made those decisions who made his decisions to mislead the country in these issues and that's -- to -- to the bottom of the data the assassination -- the three other Americans were killed as well.
President Clinton called President Obama called Hillary Clinton.
It at -- are we need to know what that conversation was that's what that's what an investigation -- about.
That's what congressional investigators are doing.
That's what the document I don't know eleven get because that's you know they're not well they're there there's there's there's a point at which they might invoke privilege and -- we're gonna have to have a big debate about that.
Right do you see this damaging.
President Obama so that the Republican Party will take control of congress in 2000 for each its bill it's just way too -- -- companies that this -- -- -- -- -- -- Obama administration -- the point -- this is an -- abuse -- -- -- one of -- -- Mitt -- -- -- -- in the last election.
Which we were debating against big government theory we to compete against the promise and the rhetoric of President Obama will now in the second term.
-- -- -- in -- agenda we are seeing big government and and -- OK but the bigger problem that you and the governor had wish you were not only campaigning against Barack Obama with the American press.
Except for Bill O'Reilly -- we're fair hearing and I think you know I thought I'd you know we don't know I'm not just have fallen right.
But but now.
The press maybe turn.
Have you noticed that -- I think when you see with the Jim James Rosen case the AP case right the press.
Understands the First Amendment extremely well and I think they take that -- extremely seriously.
And you just can't hide from the fact that this -- arrests abuse is arrogant and obnoxious the question is dangerous who knew about it how systemic and how widespread was it in and win you -- -- -- power.
Or will you keep the factor posted here actually all right.
Congressman good to see you thank you for coming in to -- That's on the -- Bob Beckel will apply.
Filter by section