Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Outside the Republican National Committee has filed a request demanding any emails and documents between the State Department and president Obama's reelection campaign related to the -- -- terror attack.
And they -- -- seeking material containing the words Libya or Ben -- between the daily attacks September the eleventh an Election Day November the seventh.
And in another effort to expose the administration's massive national security cover up.
Chairman of the house oversight committee -- I say issued a subpoena on Tuesday demanding more documents related to the crafting of the Ben Ghazi talking points.
But in a bombshell development yesterday the State Department spokeswoman revealed that -- department may not comply with the subpoena watch less.
We remain committed as we have consistently -- to working with congress.
And we are taking stock of this recent.
Subpoena and determining the next appropriate steps so when you say your determining the next appropriate steps you haven't yet decided.
Whether or not the State Department will be providing the documents that are in the subpoena.
That's -- but we have provided just as a reminder of course -- hundred pages of of documents -- the talking points that this this is regarding.
-- reaction author crisis -- five rules for coping with crisis in business politics and life.
Lanny Davis and Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson junior.
It if they don't hand over everything Peter what's the point.
Then there is no point it's regrettable that the RNC had to do it but it's refreshing.
Because we've had this atmosphere of deceit deception.
For verification of the word call lying.
From Jay Carney.
To the president.
Too high officials and our government with ten different stories none of them true -- it takes -- Freedom of Information Act request.
To cleanse the garbage then let's get to the truth now.
Now right now -- I mean.
You may disagree with the president but the president did advance of narrative.
Two weeks after.
The the terror attacks but -- on the view and on -- that book move for the United Nations.
Over this idea that we now know is false that this was spontaneous -- wasn't.
And number two that this was.
For example not a terror related incidents.
You know that the fact is that the twelve versions of the talking points that contained exactly what you just said.
Was said by the CIA to have authored the very words you just -- planet that's not true Obama.
That's like twelve after Russian women that's twelve version Petraeus said he didn't want anything to do what they didn't want -- the release it.
I asked you whether it is a fact that in all twelve versions the CIA draft said spontaneous demonstration.
Inspired by -- -- -- like -- -- a you're you're you're a great lawyer and you were really -- it all depends what is is defending Bill Clinton and and I didn't.
That's -- -- that with a wet but wedeman but the reality is it went from the truth that this was terror related.
On -- Al Sharia to a lie about this being related to YouTube video.
And that doesn't want to -- this state that did the CIA Natalie admitted.
To -- inspired by Cairo protests and spontaneous protests in -- -- -- they also admitted to having scratched out any reference to al-Qaeda -- -- that point they'll Lanny what's the point.
I didn't want to know where and what you know it was and the result was exactly right back the president -- September 25.
That the United Nations led the United States and the world to believe that this is a spontaneous attack that occurred because of an anti Muslim video.
That's what he was hinting at it the United Nations fourteen days later.
Two weeks later -- audience September 19 talked about a video.
On September 14.
Ambassador rising made up this notion in the scenario Peter -- that that isn't a plot that the CIA it was politicized but I don't know why you I.
I know you wanted to -- -- mistake if I.
Your own reasons where I don't care whether it's CIA state I don't you don't want to tell us a light -- no -- cure the fact there's a web of deceit is basically USA for kind.
Predicted have you you have Inkatha I have my presidential candidate himself at this CIA wrote those -- if -- absolutely defending the indefensible it's tough to argue you've had more experience than anybody in our industry in doing it but you know the facts are not.
With you here.
Let me let me let me let me don't say anything out of family and other series has not only tonight Peter I want -- -- -- women I get to ask questions I'm not a potted plant.
-- -- John let let me let me ask it's hard to find a better question that I want -- I said John I wanna know we don't we still don't know why the request for security was -- We don't know why stand -- at stand down orders were denied we don't know where the president was in the day of the attack and we don't know how.
The original talking points were truthful and became a lot of those important part.
Since -- was a critical questions go where was the commander chief.
Why was the commander in chief packing for Las Vegas.
When Americans were under fire 125.
To 150 members of Mansoor Al -- -- who still not been brought to justice.
We're attacking Americans.
Why did the Libyan officials say was a terror attack.
Why does the president sometimes say.
Oh no I said it was a terror attack -- And then two weeks later the United Nations.
Talks about a video and condemns this anti Muslim video that had nothing to do with this attack.
-- -- -- it basically am Larry let me ask you is there anything.
Before were denied requested security.
Adoring people told to stand down the president MIA.
After a web of lies is -- any part of this in -- Liberal Clinton supporting mind that is bothered by it.
Not that you do name calling look I think it's a very serious matter -- in four Americans died what bothers you about what I aside I I think I think that the study made by the review board that.
Secretaries of state Clinton appointed -- -- major changes that the State Department -- today's stage Clinton was and then drive to an odd -- that's America's way.
And and and they haven't I haven't.
Usually when you interrupt me -- I'm visit in erupting is going to -- -- in all of this eight.
Yes or no to a fast speaking just interrupted me so I will finish please I think it's a very serious matter I think it deserves full investigation.
It was investigated including -- admiral Mullen.
Who came up with 47 or 37.
Excuse me recommendation secretary of state Clinton accepted them and I.
Did you didn't answer my.
It's a very serious matter.
Let me move -- -- one other issue and -- I'm gonna give me a chance to redeem yourself with this issue but as you did -- -- It was politically brain dead to label a fox reporter our colleague James Rosen a co conspirator.
Yes I think that I don't.
Doubt that Eric Holder.
Believed that there was a necessity to investigate a very serious national security breach I disagree and vote today he's a friend of mind.
That the notion that you should name -- co conspirator.
Who is it.
Legitimate and highly respected reporter and then accuse him of a crime and -- -- -- considered.
Is that it was a very bad news Linden thinks he's expressed it no I don't think you should go any would you agree yeah.
He should apologize to James Rosen Fox News and and -- great lawyer noisily was -- an allegation.
That he was the treasonous American Indian Ocean and back and that's exactly -- -- -- a partisan -- dividend.
At that somebody as he wanted to review as for an apology -- that would -- no I don't agree that you say -- -- your double standard revealed tonight Peter when you couldn't answer is simple under the Democrats fact -- -- -- -- he wanted to screaming down.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- As -- I think that's how I teach my kids -- thank you both and coming up just how bad.
Filter by section