Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
You're watching a special live it -- And trials.
-- -- former federal prosecutor used here on fox regularly as well as really Spencer who's a defense attorney and join me.
Before the break we were talking about the female dynamic because it is an unusual situation a lot of people across America are saying that is unusual.
You admit that it's unusual.
Do women tend to look at this responsibility different than women -- a loaded question.
But before the break I suggested that women might be a little more deliberative take their time.
If you -- six -- they go on to say you know the game is on in three hours and we need to hurry -- just the fact recoba gotten yeah we hope not but let's face a manner.
Get it done charge in there and be done -- it.
I think that's true and I also think it's true because of the extra dynamic here only six women so -- had.
Do you have for women's -- two -- -- assuming that your hypothesis is correct which I think it is always always it's always.
-- -- -- of course it is that you're always okay thank you -- That that the men.
With that kind of mentality might be able to -- personal probably would try to play some -- -- the four person you.
And would sort of take over control of it let's do it this -- boom boom boom and the women might shy back a little bit now we got six women in there.
And think that a woman at the four person that a woman judge by the way don't forget about that night -- The only man involved here with the defendant and the lawyers.
That I think they will step back more I think you see that there are being delivered to.
Think -- -- right I absolutely agree that women can be a little bit more deliberative that a little bit more attuned to the with the least of all of the evidence right -- in the case now that's good that's a very specific request they don't want to miss a thing.
I don't think however that men and women differ in in this respect when these jurors were sworn in they took an oath.
The -- -- they put their hand on the Bible and they said that they would follow the letter of the law and the judge in this case as every judge in a criminal case would say.
You're gonna take your preconceived notions of the law or personal diocese and you're gonna put him on a shelf.
And you're gonna keep your mind open and you're gonna follow what I said.
And you're gonna go through this case based on the evidence nothing else and it seems like that's what what you're women they're doing are doing in this -- -- Read -- one instruction from monitoring -- this case must not be decided for or against anyone.
Because you feel sorry for anyone or angry at anyone who feel sorry for trade on -- feel angry at government or vice Versa.
And I have not seen out -- -- -- -- I haven't really seen that too many jury instructions I don't know if that's because they're women on the panel.
Or it's just you know this is such -- fraught I mostly fraud case.
I think that language is very unique.
But there are general instruction state -- state by state the instructions -- But that the gist of it is the same you cannot make a decision in a criminal case based on upon -- -- it have to be based on the evidence right.
In the jury room they go when their for the first time.
Do they just walking there is -- one of -- has to be the Foreman -- do we have a vote to happen what is sort of dynamic for a person he or worse.
And some courtroom I'm OK I've started right up into courtrooms it just simply random walk is that this seat that you get in that box if you're the first third of be seated.
You become the four person in other states and other jurisdictions.
It can be done by a vote or can just be somebody who assumes that responsibility.
I think it's human nature when you put people together in -- confined -- that someone regardless of the title or person -- sort of take the lead will be.
More vocal and sort of corral the troops if you well I have no doubt that's what's happening in this.
-- as a dynamic guy though that is so much a part of what the verdict ultimately is and I have to believe these jurors understand even though they're sequestered and I think that's a factor here too.
They can't watch the news coverage but they have to know.
That everybody in America it is attuned.
To what they are going to decide I think they can hear.
People outside their only on the second or third floor they're deliberating.
And you've you've seen a protest would you -- -- -- alternate I think they could hear what's going on there in a hotel coming back and forth to this courthouse they can see what's going on.
No they can't read the paper know they can't watch television but I think they knew even before they went in the suspect it seems like it's been years of -- and -- -- it's only been a couple of weeks.
And the media.
As focused on in the last couple weeks but the media there has been you know over the top for well over a year or so they know exactly how big this case.
And it's also a tremendous sacrifice to these terrorists because they've been away from their homes their families their friends -- work.
They continue cell -- -- Internet they don't really cut off from the world and from their lives they're doing their -- actually.
Finish what we need to take a break.
Filter by section