Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
While George -- remains in hiding in the spotlight turns to the special prosecutor who led the charge to throw the -- at -- even before the jury reached its verdict some legal experts were dismayed by the conduct.
This woman Angela Corey they suggested that she had over reached on -- case and then that she had tried to hide evidence.
From Zimmer and his defense team.
One prominent attorney even suggested that she should be quote dis barred -- has more on this -- -- West Coast Asia.
And -- call -- shortly after the verdict Angela Corey came out held a news conference to thank her prosecution team and she seemed oddly content with the verdict and then she said that all along she was only seeking the truth listen.
When we announced the charges fifteen months ago.
We also promised that we would seek the truth portray bond -- And case before a jury.
And we chose to do it that way because we felt that everyone.
Had a right to know everything about this case.
But remember was Angela Corey who brought the second degree murder charges against Zimmerman and in her charging affidavit she released statements that many said were very misleading for example that.
But -- on -- profile rather George Zimmerman was profiled.
And that Zimmerman disregard the police dispatcher and they continue to follow trade bond -- and trade bonds Martin's mother identified the voice crying for help.
As -- on Martin's voice even more -- was what she left out of that affidavit including evidence.
That would have helped George -- George -- the exculpatory evidence like the injuries that he suffered and the witness statements that supported him.
Legal experts say prosecutors do not support the defense they do not support the prosecution they are supposed to seek out the truth.
And Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz took it even a step further let's.
Submitted an affidavit that was if not -- jury is completely.
All kinds of rules of the profession and her current quarter and criminal conduct.
For more on this let's bring in Fox News senior judicial analyst judge.
And you know volatile judge great to see -- you -- you you read through this charging affidavit as we did many many months ago.
And it seems to many that was very one sided.
And moreover it left out a lot of key facts as we just mentioned that really could have benefited George -- in this case and.
And the government has an obligation -- and and thank you -- me it's always nice to be with -- The government has an obligation to reveal all of this ears how the the law works in Florida.
In Florida when the government wants to charge someone with a felony it can bring evidence before grand jury.
Present the evidence notify the target let the target the person -- that attempting to indict.
Up present evidence before the grand jury in the grand jury weighs -- Simpson and and decides whether or not to indict they almost always do what the prosecutors want them to do.
But there's a weighing in sifting of the evidence the other way which is the way they did -- -- for that lady a prosecutor in charge Angela Corey.
Simply to file the complaint.
Supported by an affidavit that she signed now when -- signs that affidavit.
She is required to inform the court.
Not only of the strengths and her case but of the weaknesses as well so when professor Dershowitz says.
She -- it appears she did lie.
When he said she didn't comply with the rules of ethics and appeared -- she did not comply with the rules of ethics.
When he said she may have committed a crime well lying under growth is a crime it's a -- -- she prosecutes people for Sheen materially misled the court.
Into thinking she had a far stronger case than she did and I dare say which Trace.
If I'd been a -- or any judged let's take judge Nelson who tried the case.
And and the judge knew what we now know about the case.
-- was obliged to tell the judge from the outset -- judge probably would have rejected the charge of second degree murder and said you need to charge.
Him -- something less.
Yeah and I am running out of time -- -- -- -- -- -- really want further and just talk about how mark Merritt says that he believes that Angela -- and her office actually withheld evidence and I wanna know what exactly George Zimmerman and his attorneys what right did they have to actually go back after that the government in this case well if she's so those were malicious prosecution she will lead have it if Zimmerman -- or malicious prosecution.
He will have to demonstrate.
That -- Korea's behavior was motivated.
Not by that facts in the case.
But by an overriding desire to win and that overriding desire to win caused her to break the rules and break the law.
And and expose him.
230 years in jail when he should have been exposed to it at all a lot of us who have looked at this are beginning to think he probably should file.
Such a case that so unjustified and unjustifiable this prosecution turned out today.
Filter by section