Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Question is are the media getting this story right there or is there a bias either pro intervention -- anti intervention.
In the wake of the terrible chemical weapons attack but I think -- seems to be consensus that something was used by someone.
The administration says that we have so again status -- NATO intelligence.
They've definitely indicates that the -- -- government used this.
These weapons against innocent civilians thousand dad therefore we're going to do something and the debate in the media.
Really is I think it mirrors that among the American people.
The American people according to a Wall Street Journal poll that was published today.
Indicates that the American people are overwhelmingly against intervention.
The largest section of about 42%.
Are pro humanitarian.
-- things we should give people food water shelter whenever we -- But not do anything military.
There are between now and no more than 10% of the country that really so support for military intervention.
I think he would see.
Even if it's by -- by the -- standoff capability in use -- cruise missiles -- lambs.
Things that which don't endanger American lines that the American public is very skeptical and therefore the American Media.
Share that skepticism.
-- using the American Media -- responding to a look at a great skepticism and the about administration clearly is considering doing something.
Voluntarily -- -- may be that big that certainly not enough.
Right and that's at some people are saying but why do anything if it's just for shells.
And -- might take military action use military force if you're not going to.
Engage jury chief quote regime change -- why do that I mean then then we just -- kind of -- -- Yes you're right if you can't call -- -- -- Wall Street Journal I was surprised very surprised yesterday to read the Wall Street Journal -- We should intervene we should topple -- side.
Brad Stevens Stevens target Assad target Assad specifically target him -- -- my target this -- get rid of them.
Now that's one position that maritime and in the Wall Street Journal what are the other meteors anybody coming out editorials advising the president -- -- -- A lot of papers are taking the opposite position which is why do something if it is just for show I mean -- -- intervene in some thing.
That we in which we may actually make things worse.
-- what worst and best case of US policy is that Obama gets his -- an -- he's remove.
The question that a lot of newspaper and mostly editorial boards are asking is.
And then more I was -- -- -- -- lot.
Who takes over will it be better for the Syrian people will it be better for the region in terms of stability will be better for American -- -- Mean you know we have interest in the region -- that may or may not.
Can be consistent with there's so.
And the especially after what's happened in Bolivia.
Where we removed one dictator -- -- mad when he eternally interesting if you're a journalist.
A colonel Qaddafi.
And now you have a government that's struggling to find its way that doesn't really control -- country.
In which we had four Americans including an American ambassador killed -- -- Ghazi.
In other words sometimes when we get what we think we want does that really advance American interest here getting a lot -- debate in the American Media have good answers your network -- correspondent it doesn't seem having journalists -- -- is anybody.
Really covering -- -- they're adequately there are some journalists unfortunately as far as I'm concerned because I really think it's.
Terribly terribly dangerous right now and if I were the editor in chief of the newspaper -- are in charge of people.
Human beings reporters photographers.
On the ground I don't think I would recommend at this point being in Syria but.
There's so much that's coming out because of local media.
Because of the blockers in the people taking.
Video and footage we have.
In many ways better coverage than we've ever had just from -- what you don't get.
Is the American filter that is this information is not being filtered through.
Americans who share car.
Assumptions about you know what is in our interest in that scenario that you're in Iraq they're getting the wrong -- raw stuff but it's better than not getting something that Albany is.
Simply to in nineteen too dangerous right now for Americans to be there -- okay well this is differentiating our actually.
I'm every Saturday looking -- and -- -- Saturday at 230 in the afternoon.
Eastern time Sundays at 33 inning after -- after -- Fox News Channel Judy Miller with Jon Scott.
And our weekly.
What are we calling that well I think it's -- -- that advice bash -- still early but we have a and you show this is the last news watch this on my parents got me -- and -- and then we will switch over to me.
And new media buzz with elephants at bat well definitely there with Judy Miller one way or the other thanks so much for joining us take your thinking out there.
Filter by section