Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Outrage today following the release of a violent climate change video.
The environmental group that produced it thought it would be funny.
After only a few hours on the Internet it had to take the thing down because of a massive backlash over the horrific.
Now a warning to our viewers.
What you -- about to see is extremely graphic please this will be disturbing to some.
My case just.
We then at the week I gave him yet -- remind me medical.
-- -- I say it every month stop could connect confident nation back then and tell us keep your -- -- -- -- -- at -- to me.
We think he's not column I -- -- just think tonight.
Now and that -- pressure until would it be great to get a sense of how many he ninety's -- just them but -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Permanent -- from -- entrance.
Thank you Sam looks good today and I -- -- cool -- at -- We told you -- that tells me.
-- Everybody needs an amendment to -- chapters five and six on OK -- I -- vacation.
Except for the content can come.
That's what they thought would make you laugh.
We stop the video at that point because what happens next is even more horrifying.
That what you just saw.
Mark Graham is executive editor and chief correspondent for climate depot dot com which is a group of global warming.
Skeptics -- try to get the folks behind this ad and shockingly.
They didn't want c'mon to defend it in fact mark thank you so much for being here they'd come out while they pulled this and I wanna show our viewers their explanation.
This is there apology.
We wanted to find a way to bring this critical issue back into the headlines whilst making people laugh and many people found the resulting film extremely funny.
Some didn't and we sincerely apologize to anybody we have offended oh well we live and learn.
I'm telling you mark you show a little children getting blown up because they don't want to support.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- This is sadly what they've been reduced to this is that desperate group and I mean the global warming fear promoters are desperation right now.
President Obama has failed them the US senate has -- and the United Nations is failing them the public is failing them.
They needed to do something to get attention so -- -- to get attention was the blow up school children and as glory and discussed in a manner as possible.
And it is spectacularly backfired but many are still defending it as just satire and humor.
The problem Megan is this express is a very deep so adamant in their movement.
Of wanting to get rid of in silence global warming skeptics and we -- Al Gore in 1990 to -- the debate over and lobby Ted Koppel.
You keep skeptics off TV we had grist magazine called for Nuremburg style trial.
For global warming skeptics.
So there's been an actual intellectual strain hair the silence skeptics including Tom Friedman who lauded China's environmental policies because one party rule could work to the advantage in getting needed things done without those meddling skeptic.
Yes it is the entire real -- satire is one thing right but.
But yet blowing up a little children in very graphic form and shelling it for all the world to see and and the sound effects that go along with -- And then really shocking stuff here and does not mean this video was on for several minutes as they do this to more people who express any sort of skepticism about global warming.
In my question you is in this staining of extremists on both sides on the far right in the far left who unfortunately sometimes do resort to violence.
To make their -- as good as -- be perceived as somebody who doesn't quite have all -- irons in the fire.
As a rallying cry as an idea.
You have absolutely that's if you look at -- that -- recently the discovery gunman hair.
And Washington DC I mean he was on the news and NBC ranting about the lack a global warming coverage he wanted to kill people.
There's a lot of crazies out there who will use this to further get them you know jazzed up about harming people so it's very frightening stuff.
But the main thing is intellectually the global warming fear promoters had used intimidation Robert F Kennedy junior said skeptics.
Where -- the traitors and should be tried for treason UN officials -- that it's criminally negligent.
Did not believe in man -- global warming is morally irresponsible that rhetoric means things and it -- -- people to.
Act -- in this group that this 1010 campaign that's behind us they hired this guy Richard Curtis who by the way wrote.
Four weddings and a funeral and nodding hill he's very he's very well liked over a Great Britain you have to write this thing he wrote it and in case you're an X-Files fan.
It stars Gillian Anderson at the end she's happy to provide her voice that voice over.
She's loving and taking part in this ad showing them the blowing up of little children she's welcome to come on the program and defend that action.
But nonetheless they -- -- in -- that they may put this out there.
And according to some reports mark.
They they use it government.
Funded that the that they use taxpayer money in Great Britain to fund it is that the -- yes.
The government has contributed to this organization.
Also major corporate sponsors have been behind this.
Major environmental groups have supported this now the question is what kind of -- will there be will -- corporate sponsors pull that will the UK government.
The -- its money back will there be a combination that will wait and say it's just came out it's just blew up a few days ago.
So to speak so we will see where it goes but let's hope -- snuff films aren't the future.
Others say that that corporate sponsors include.
020 Sony and Kyocera yes who are who you back and they help on this 1010 campaign.
Which is one thing you know to to promote.
Awareness about global warning women what we saw there's quite another mark I gotta go thank you some insurance I think he made picking your thoughts -- Kelly at foxnews.com.
Well could there be a break.
Filter by section