Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
-- your -- Daniel Ellsberg is the former military intelligence officer.
-- forty years ago leaked the Pentagon papers.
And last Saturday made a surprise appearance at the WikiLeaks conference.
You are mr.
oberg endorsing what WikiLeaks is doing obviously.
And you think -- -- again further right.
Well -- they released.
What they we have a lot of production.
Apparently the pentagon group was first Torre -- looking at the material that -- that they believe the remains of informants.
Fact triple world mentioned 300 informant.
But they were going from the documents -- not from.
That the Pentagon the classified documents not from what we -- have released with a lot of protection.
It turned out that none of the names 300 names were in the in the documents particularly attractive -- at least -- These are not the Pentagon think these are not high level decision papers that reveal the the decision making on.
The rack up -- field level reports.
But central pentagon papers were not so I don't think about the CIA -- they were not to let cord either.
And -- gives decided -- award that the Pentagon papers the medical truveo which has not been revealed by the it really was.
A lot of I would -- very significant lieutenant.
What does this do doctor Ellsberg that the the Pentagon papers did not -- The Pentagon papers are dealing with higher level situation -- it could hardly any of these.
Just atrocity -- -- the true war crimes it notarized for example.
Anything like realized it was not the people around and the Pentagon papers.
I have troll that was covered up by the army Chopra quite a long time.
But you wouldn't get cancer for the Pentagon papers on the other hand in this case.
The existence of -- -- not only by British.
And -- you -- and American soldiers as trivial.
The trustees significantly from -- legal review.
There are many many instances in the official report.
See Americans were aware and reporting terrifically well full.
Torture by our Iraqi allies in congress potential cases in the presence of America and there was no question -- what was happening.
All over the order was given you officially.
He's supporting education I think hundreds of cases.
I'm not investigate further and it's it could direct violation of our obligations under international law and for that matter domestic club.
And if -- President Obama was treating them publicly for the first.
Which is possible in the WikiLeaks disclosures.
In the guardian amendment -- of the other -- and it's time for him to.
Undertake the investigation into the work force gone before and couldn't take action he's really obligated to do that -- that -- You are you saying doctor -- that this this normal.
Well and he's complicit in this -- and he should act now a couple of consultant competitive.
Like -- were you saying that this is this is more damaging than the Pentagon papers.
No it's you know under different -- C.
In both cases -- for example hello I'm sorry both wars we get the phenomenon.
Of congress being -- Extremely.
That was -- when I was in the Pentagon and kept my mouth shut about it -- probably I would say.
That was true in Iraq as well as we know from a number of -- none of that is in these documents.
That's basically decision making -- Pursued what the UN charter -- to -- supreme international vulnerable at church.
-- supreme international crime crime of -- -- award -- people possible the other shorter.
That's not -- on the contrary you know what treatment of his field global war crimes -- however.
The responsibility of the commanders -- picking -- -- the commander and chief.
And which are -- obligations to would do live.
Investigate and stop the under our domestic draw as well loose monetary all sorts of different it's a different kind of -- I wouldn't say it's worse.
Or as a better it's just it's a war --
Filter by section