Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
In the meantime still no word on Afghanistan so we're blowing up the moon while we wait welcome everybody I'm -- good you know when we just 789 million bucks regret for rocket into the and then send another probe right behind -- to -- pictures of the handiwork.
And that's a moment ago calling it a huge success -- a major first.
But didn't Hollywood already do this.
-- the movie -- we're desperately trying to stop an asteroid from destroying the planet today NASA quite content.
Destroying at least a little little move.
They're looking toward him and I love these guys but maybe they should be looking for something else well I don't know Saturday.
-- this whole episode doesn't tell you -- you need to know about blowing up taxpayer dollars and NASA's once fine image in the process I don't know what does it again.
I know astronaut but this -- certainly -- there was one of the best in fact the second man to walk on the moon Buzz -- -- so many best sellers including.
A magnificent desolation buzz.
I don't know and I figured -- it's really worth it since we built a rockets a blow without -- -- that it's just -- -- -- -- Nailed absolutely.
I know that we're interested in either.
Criticizing something for -- over expenditure or were not financing something enough where somebody is doing something wrong.
This happens to be.
Over hyped by some people who said we were bombing the moon other people said we're firing a missile.
Because that's militaristic and that stirs up people in -- anti.
Thinking if we say we've wasted money on something that -- even more people opt in to being.
But he's -- sweet -- don't -- get into the moon.
Yes yes you know OK so well and here I know I asked if I'm just wondering.
We spend money to crash a rocket into the -- -- absolutely and -- it's okay.
Yes -- Because it was the upper stage rocket which is going to be jettisoned somewhere anyway.
When it hits the moon and very sensitive place.
In a dark.
Shadowed crater that is eternally.
-- for comment has impacted the moon the ice from that comment will have spread.
Who frost or snow flakes or to others around that's.
H two -- So that's what we're looking for right we're looking for evidence of water having once been.
On the moon or in this case still -- just under the surface.
Well we we have been for 35 years.
Or forty years but we've been looking to justified the supposition.
In a form of frost or -- should exist.
From impacts of comments.
In the always shadowed portion.
The craters at the poll.
That where the sun is very low on the horizon.
And certain parts of craters are always shadowed.
Now to verify.
This mission was planned to have.
A Hurley mission -- looking at certain other properties of the moon right hand as it approached determination.
Of the mission.
It would take.
Two portions of the spacecraft.
And very carefully.
Navigate them so that that.
I -- I don't -- -- -- up but but I love you dearly you -- it's zero I grew up worshipping you.
Forty years ago you you -- -- walked on the moon now you can't tell me -- you would envision the day forty years later.
When NASA the same folks who put you on the moon and made human history would be going back.
Just -- -- rocket into the surface looking for water.
This is a scientific.
Other satellites with sensors on them have detected not -- -- the presence of hydrogen.
In the ins.
Is expected areas.
That total darkness and a shadow over creator.
But David suspect they've had detected the presence of a different variety.
Molecules that are probably from the solar wind and that I had high velocity and -- in an -- win.
Everything you're saying your email us what would you do this -- -- -- you all the things he wanted to see NASA do.
Right -- on the list of things to do for NASA.
Would this be any use talked about going out to the heavens and Canada too don't -- Mars and on the way out we're doing an outstanding.
Don't get me wrong I -- I do not believe American astronauts should go back to the moon.
I believe that the experience.
That we in the United States have.
Forty years ago and the experience of the the last four or five years planning on Constellation Program.
Two to go to the moon by -- -- eight point -- with US astronauts.
And two prepare.
By going to the moon.
Four periods of time.
To then prepare to go to bars I think that that is an erroneous.
Program can because the the way that it has been implemented.
With two different rockets Ares one and Ares five.
When what you really need.
Our -- three and Barry's three but that gets into the technical -- had -- the vehicle expense and overrun of Ares one.
And it's under power.
Are forcing the over a large size of the Lander Al chair and the over expense of Ares five -- -- three program should be canceled -- and the Augustine commission are at -- given options.
Of flexible plans of going into the.
-- -- two -- you're so Smart buys you less you lawsuit about two minutes ago but but I love having you on you love this.
I still that your hero I think this is -- but I certainly don't apply the same view because I know what you do to people who question -- you really walk on the moon that's one glad you're on a remote locations.
But do you regret that you need a scientist on here I will probably -- what I can promise you I'll get right but we're done -- -- -- Jim Garvin NASA is a person garment and have some writing it down we're gonna have a -- -- buzz -- not come back here and tell you I think they you know had a different plan understood understood in the meantime.
Filter by section