Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
When -- -- going back into action on the docket today billions in the bank three sprawling estates in three prim and proper children.
But now Camelot is crumbling in -- Greenwich Connecticut.
Stephanie -- are one of Victoria's Secret most famous faces not to mention bodies.
And -- -- with polo player and bad boy billionaire Peter -- her husband's divorce court after more than a decade of jet setting high society.
She says Brandt is a violent hot head.
Famous for its explosive outbursts he says she has a history of drug abuse and other bad behavior and now they're fighting over money the mansion is and custody.
So who's got the upper hand with -- Fox News legal analyst and we'll and defense attorney mark my garage morning panel to see you getting ugly it is getting.
Do you the ugly.
This you know this idea of -- Somebody once said which is something like you lose and how you get up.
She Stephanie Seymour has a history of that behavior is with men and it's a pattern that seem to be repeating itself.
Least she's making.
A lot of demands she wants a lot of money does she have the ground to get at all.
They did she really does edited had a fourteen year marriage at each step of what you know match made in heaven who want -- these guys write him and I'm totally -- you but she brought glamour and celeb to him.
All these beautiful children she made him.
You know cause celeb around -- everything made him acceptable in the Hamptons and all that.
Now what she's saying is after a fourteen year marriage look you know maybe she's getting tossed out for the newer model you'll pardon the time she's saying I should get half of what ever you do -- paid.
During those fourteen years and that will be including the mansion that we'll be including custody of the kids and she absolutely is entitled to she wants custody she wants exclusive use of the Greenwich home which she's now living in the made quarters she claims he put her there.
She wants alimony she wants half of everything.
You know markets now like it was a one year marriage where she's just try to get you know part of his billions she was married to for fourteen years had three children with them.
-- she's entitled to something that we stop for a moment recognize the best selling author who just that a small thing.
Per outbreak newer model that was brilliant has got a jab at -- quiet -- initiated -- let let's move followers.
You know here's my concern you've got a rain beautiful children epicenter -- this bitter ugly divorce.
You know -- I think that may be to get we don't know what's really the truth here but it's possible that children are being used as pawns because she wants full custody and -- no allegation is not a loving.
Decent father to -- children who need him she says he's -- -- -- threatening us here today.
To her is -- -- number one we don't know that's true but there's no allegation at all anywhere that I read I looked hard the -- anything.
That would lead you to believe that heat is not what's in the best interest to these children an odd thing to the exclusion of -- but there -- one thing -- -- it's true that raises some concerns if she's relapse.
If he's still using alcohol it's still using drugs.
I have concerns about what's in the best interest of the -- That's his concern -- she -- it had the husband asking the judge to order her to undergo drug and alcohol testing.
Apparently she admits to a history of drug abuse and back in her Axl Rose days.
Our viewers -- that may or may not remember she dated the lead singer of Guns 'N Roses.
For quite some time -- back their party gazing he accused her back then of infidelity.
And physical abuse Axl wrote said that she swung at him with a chair punched him in the crotch but after Christmas parties are that's that -- -- -- I -- -- -- -- -- back in 1993 -- this -- Before she had children and right now the husband accused -- it -- is billionaires is known as the John McEnroe Apollo and I'm not a big polo player but I -- that's not a good thing tonight I think it.
It felt that that -- -- -- management right at all so apparently he Lockheed have that lot's changed on her house she competed and she and they he told the the principal at the daughter the youngest girls.
-- four years old he mommy can't pick you up real horrible is that.
Maybe they should share some custody that she should have primary custody custodial custody and use -- -- -- these markets have been through an up.
Why should they have to be moved to go to some.
Needs court mark -- get half I mean I understand that you merit in fourteen years but she really helping create that entire fortune he came to the marriage of billionaire why should she get hat.
I don't think -- shut I think that.
That she needs to in the interest of the children in the interest of peace tranquility -- of the table don't make the lawyers rich.
Resolve this matter and -- But now that -- in the law is that it and Connecticut is not a community property state so it is slammed look at what it's not.
The law is still Apatow and equitable distribution which means that she has a right to at least half at least half of wherever he made during their fourteen year marriage because she was contributing by having the kids by staying home with the kids by -- -- -- -- making in the celebrity that was their deal that was the -- okay but does she knows that my -- -- that he argument that she -- that that she loses.
Because of bad behavior during the marriage either towards him or towards the children or with respect to drug use it -- -- all that only relevant he custody.
He is definitely going to raise those issues what I hear about him which is why -- bet not him.
Is he you'll do whatever it takes this guy -- of the fabric on the polo field at yet -- fight maverick and you know what.
Well you know what he's willing to do what it takes it -- I think that's right.
In fact I think it's wrong when you have children involved but what I'm saying is.
This is a guy -- -- -- -- whatever money up it takes to fight this -- and -- read it every if you clinics -- it helps me is we're only hearing about this big bad behavior on her part after she filed for divorce from him we haven't heard about that in the fourteen years of their -- you know is obviously she's a public figure dragging her reputation.
Into the mud doesn't help David scandal in Greenwich and that will be following it as they go to this proceeding unfortunately -- real mark I gosh thanks so much for being here.
-- final -- for our viewers cardinal rule of depends.
Love your children more than you hate your -- name calling nasty public allegations and banishment to the maid's quarters ignore the rule.
This judge should put these two in their place.
He should come up pretty fair split the assets and -- you should consider a stern lecture to these badly behaving billionaire.
Filter by section